Measuring chandler wobble amplitude variations using IERS EOP C04 data
-
Published:2023
Issue:207
Volume:
Page:29-37
-
ISSN:1450-698X
-
Container-title:Serbian Astronomical Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Serb Astron J
Author:
Damljanovic G.1ORCID, Vasilic V.2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Astronomical Observatory, Belgrade, Serbia 2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
We analyzed the Earth's long-term polar motion using the time series IERS EOP
C04 (International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service - IERS;
Earth Orientation Parameters - EOP; Combination of four (04) techniques -
C04), from 1984 to 2023, to determine the variation of the Chandler wobble
amplitude. To compare the results based on the C04 with the so-called
Belgrade latitude data (Belgrade Lunette Zenithale - BLZ series 1949-1985)
results, we calculated the latitude variations at the BLZ point using the
C04 coordinates (x, y). The secular part of these latitude variations was
determined by applying the least-squares method (LSM) and removed from the
data to obtain the residuals. We used Direct Fourier transforms to extract
annual and semiannual oscillations and to remove them from the residuals
(resulting in a new set of residuals). These new residuals were divided into
33 independent 1.2-year subintervals. For each subinterval, we calculated
the amplitude, period, and phase of the Chandler nutation using LSM. The
quasi-periodic instability of 33 values of the Chandler wobble amplitude is
detected with a period of 54.5 years using LSM (it was 38.5 years from the
BLZ data 1949-1985); the amplitude of that quasi-periodic variation is 0
.''087 (0 .''06 from BLZ data). The amplitude of the Chandler nutation
varies between minimum of 0 .''012 (at 2019.3) and a maximum of 0 .''23 (at
1994.1); the period is stable, but the phase is not stable. We applied the
Abbe's criterion to explain the variability in 33 values of the Chandler
wobble amplitude and the hypothesis that there is no trend in these 33
values is rejected based on the criterion. The obtained amplitude modulation
is in accordance with previous studies, but also with our own results based
on the BLZ data. Probably, the cause lies in the hydro-atmospheric
circulation that could influence calculated quasi-periodic variation. A
possible explanation can be found in the change in core-mantle
electromagnetic coupling (in agreement with the last few years'
investigations). In recent papers, it has been indicated that the effects of
geomagnetic jerks are more important for exciting a free nutation than the
net effect of atmosphere and oceans.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference13 articles.
1. An, Y. and Ding, H. 2022, Geodesy and Geodynamics, 13, 427 2. Cui, X., Sun, H., Xu, J., Zhou, J. and Chen, X. 2020, Journal of Geodesy, 94, 38 3. Damljanović, G., Pejović, N. and Djurović, D. 1997, Bulletin Astronomique de Belgrade, 156, 71 4. Damljanović, G., Stojanović, M. and Aleksić, J. 2021, SerAJ, 203, 37 5. Gross, R. S. 2000, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 2329
|
|