The strength of the intergovernmental principle in the common security and defence policy and the weakness of the eu’s strategic autonomy ambitions in the context of the ukrainian crisis

Author:

Igrutinovic Milan1ORCID,Curcic Sladjana1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of European Studies, Belgrade

Abstract

Since the beginning of Russia?s open military attack on Ukraine in February 2022, the European Union has introduced thirteen new packages of economic sanctions against Russia. Moreover, in addition to direct economic aid to Kyiv, Brussels and a number of member states have pursued a policy of sending military aid in various forms, mostly in accordance with their own assessments of security interests and available capabilities. The EU established a military assistance mission (EUMAM Ukraine) and began to use part of the existing programs, such as the European Peace Facility, for the purpose of equipping the Ukrainian army. In addition, the perception of Russia as a longterm threat is increasingly influencing new plans in the field of military industry and future armaments. In this paper, we want to analyse the cooperation of these steps taken by the EU and which member states take independently or (and) in cooperation through NATO as the dominant military alliance on European soil. Our argument is that the practice of this military crisis shows that member states to a negligible extent tend to use the Common Security and Defense Policy as a framework for their actions, to strengthen and build it in the long term, but tend to use either the bilateral ties - towards Ukraine and among each other, or the existing framework of NATO. This argumentation confirms the postulates of the new intergovernmentalism in the study of CSDP. In political practice, the intergovernmental principle remains dominant in the CSDP domain, and shows that the current practice is not effectively aimed at strengthening the CSDP nor does it provide a new synergistic effect, and that relatively, in the broader balance of power, the EU loses compared to the existing ties within the NATO pact and new flexible forms of bilateral and multilateral cooperation of its member states, outside the CSDP.

Publisher

National Library of Serbia

Reference68 articles.

1. Andersson, Jan Joel. 2023. European defence partnerships. Stronger together. Brief/3, 2023. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep48495.pdf?acceptTC=true&coverpage=false&addFooter=false.

2. Army Times. 2023. “Ukrainian battalion completes first combined-arms training in Germany”, February 17. https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2023/02/17/ukrainian-battalion-completes-first-combined-arms-training-in-germany/.

3. Army Recognition. 2024. “Ukraine welcomes Rheinmetall’s new facility for production of Fuchs and KF41 Lynx armored vehicles”, January 31. https://armyrecognition.com/defense_news_january_2024_global_security_army_industry/ukraine_welcomes_rheinmetall_s_new_facility_for_production_of_fuchs_and_kf41_lynx_armored_vehicles.html

4. Bickerton, Christopher J., Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter. 2015. The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era, New York: Oxford University Press.

5. Biscop Sven. 2018. “Don’t be too shy about PESCO”. Egmont Institute for International Relations (Commentaries). September 6, 2018. https://www.egmontinstitute.be/dont-be-too-shy-about-pesco/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3