Affiliation:
1. Institute of European Studies, Belgrade
Abstract
Since the beginning of Russia?s open military attack on Ukraine in February
2022, the European Union has introduced thirteen new packages of economic
sanctions against Russia. Moreover, in addition to direct economic aid to
Kyiv, Brussels and a number of member states have pursued a policy of
sending military aid in various forms, mostly in accordance with their own
assessments of security interests and available capabilities. The EU
established a military assistance mission (EUMAM Ukraine) and began to use
part of the existing programs, such as the European Peace Facility, for the
purpose of equipping the Ukrainian army. In addition, the perception of
Russia as a longterm threat is increasingly influencing new plans in the
field of military industry and future armaments. In this paper, we want to
analyse the cooperation of these steps taken by the EU and which member
states take independently or (and) in cooperation through NATO as the
dominant military alliance on European soil. Our argument is that the
practice of this military crisis shows that member states to a negligible
extent tend to use the Common Security and Defense Policy as a framework for
their actions, to strengthen and build it in the long term, but tend to use
either the bilateral ties - towards Ukraine and among each other, or the
existing framework of NATO. This argumentation confirms the postulates of
the new intergovernmentalism in the study of CSDP. In political practice,
the intergovernmental principle remains dominant in the CSDP domain, and
shows that the current practice is not effectively aimed at strengthening
the CSDP nor does it provide a new synergistic effect, and that relatively,
in the broader balance of power, the EU loses compared to the existing ties
within the NATO pact and new flexible forms of bilateral and multilateral
cooperation of its member states, outside the CSDP.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference68 articles.
1. Andersson, Jan Joel. 2023. European defence partnerships. Stronger together. Brief/3, 2023. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS). https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep48495.pdf?acceptTC=true&coverpage=false&addFooter=false.
2. Army Times. 2023. “Ukrainian battalion completes first combined-arms training in Germany”, February 17. https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2023/02/17/ukrainian-battalion-completes-first-combined-arms-training-in-germany/.
3. Army Recognition. 2024. “Ukraine welcomes Rheinmetall’s new facility for production of Fuchs and KF41 Lynx armored vehicles”, January 31. https://armyrecognition.com/defense_news_january_2024_global_security_army_industry/ukraine_welcomes_rheinmetall_s_new_facility_for_production_of_fuchs_and_kf41_lynx_armored_vehicles.html
4. Bickerton, Christopher J., Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter. 2015. The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era, New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Biscop Sven. 2018. “Don’t be too shy about PESCO”. Egmont Institute for International Relations (Commentaries). September 6, 2018. https://www.egmontinstitute.be/dont-be-too-shy-about-pesco/.