Affiliation:
1. Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic of Abdominal and Endocrine Surgery, Novi Sad
2. Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Clinic of Abdominal and Endocrine Surgery, Novi Sad + University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad
Abstract
Introduction. Over 100 different surgical procedures for the treatment of
rectal prolapse have been described. Since these patients commonly have
associated comorbidities, methods of choice include surgical techniques with
a perineal approach, such as perineal stapled rectal resection. Case Report.
A 77-year-old female patient presented with a complete rectal prolapse
measuring 12 cm in length. Considering the associated comorbidities and the
patient?s age, perineal stapled rectal resection was chosen as the surgical
modality. She underwent surgery under general anesthesia in the dorsal
decubitus and slightly reverse-Trendelenburg position. The surgery lasted 35
minutes. The surgery and the immediate postoperative course were uneventful.
At the follow-up examination, six months after surgery, the findings were
normal, without local recurrence. There was a slight deterioration of fecal
incontinence, with a Vaizey score 10/20, but the patient tolerated it well.
Discussion. The perineal stapled rectal resection technique has fewer
intraoperative complications and 6.3% fewer postoperative complications
compared to classic perineal procedures (staple line bleeding, anastomotic
stenosis, pelvic hematoma, sigmoid colon perforation, perirectal abscesses
and rectovaginal fistulas), which were reported in many studies. However,
patients with longer postoperative followup demonstrated a higher recurrence
rate compared to patients who underwent other surgical techniques with an
abdominal approach. Conclusion. The perineal stapled rectal resection
procedure is easy to perform and acceptable for the elderly patients with
associated comorbidities, who are not candidates for other surgical
techniques with abdominal approach.
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference21 articles.
1. Gourgiotis S, Baratsis S. Rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(3):231-43.
2. Ballantyne GH. The historical evolution of anatomic concepts of rectal prolapse. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 1991;2:170-9.
3. Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg. 2005;140(1):63-73.
4. Kuijpers HC. Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect? World J Surg. 1992;16(5):826-30.
5. Hoel AT, Skarstein A, Ovrebo KK. Prolapse of the rectum, long-term results of surgical treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009; 24(2):201-7.