Affiliation:
1. institute of Ethnography SASA, Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
While focusing on the phenomenon of ?extended youth?, this paper presents the
results of anthropological research on coming of age: classical and
contemporary. The paper questions the parameters of ?normality? when it
comes to ?extending? phases, youth in particular. While examining what it
means to be young, the paper emphasises anthro?pological contributions to
life course research. First of all, the paper focuses on research that
highlights concepts seen as universal and biological. Moreover, it
approaches classical anthropological research that analyses lifecycle
customs and rites of passage. By emphasising classic an?thropological works,
such as the contributions of Margaret Mead, the paper shows how ethnographic
examples have helped present the diversity of the perception of ?ade?quate?,
?normal?, and ?good? when it comes to life stages or transitions from one
life stage to another. In addition to the work of Mead, special attention
is paid to the work of Arnold van Gennep, whose research on rites of passage
had a great influence on generations of Serbian ethnologists and
anthropologists. Van Gennep?s scheme of successive stages made up of the
pattern of rites of passage (separation, transition/liminality, and
ag?gregation) has been particularly important in the context of the
transition into adulthood. Finally, this paper analy?ses how young people in
Serbia perceive their youth and life stages in the contemporary context. The
presented results are part of a qualitative research study based on in-depth
interviews conducted in 2019 and 2020. The re?sults highlight the cultural
representations of the ?normal? life course and life stage transitions, then
present how some young people manage their transition to adulthood in order
to perceive their youth as ?well-spent?. The con?clusion examines how time,
life phases, and expectations have been constructed in the local context.
Moreover, the paper highlights the layers of the transition to adulthood and
autonomy (residential, financial, emotional etc.) that, furthermore, show
the complexity of the phenomenon of ?extended youth?. By questioning the
mainstream explanations of extended youth as an exclusive consequence of
structural factors and political crisis, the paper offers an alternative
explanation of extended youth through the analysis of cultural logic.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
National Library of Serbia
Reference43 articles.
1. Amit, T. V., & Wulff, H. (Eds.) (1995). Youth cultures: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. London: Routledge.
2. Arnett, J. J. (1997). Young People’s Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood. Youth & Society, 29(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X97029001001
3. Arnett, J. J. (2001). Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood: Perspectives from Adolescence Through Midlife. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026450103225
4. Bošković, A. (2010). Kratak uvod u antropologiju. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
5. Bucholtz, M. (2002). Youth and Cultural Practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 525-552. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085443
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献