Human-genome single nucleotide polymorphisms affecting transcription factor binding and their role in pathogenesis
-
Published:2023-11-02
Issue:6
Volume:27
Page:662-675
-
ISSN:2500-3259
-
Container-title:Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Vestn. VOGiS
Author:
Antontseva E. V.1ORCID, Degtyareva A. O.1ORCID, Korbolina E. E.1ORCID, Damarov I. S.1ORCID, Merkulova T. I.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common type of variation in the human genome. The vast majority of SNPs identified in the human genome do not have any effect on the phenotype; however, some can lead to changes in the function of a gene or the level of its expression. Most SNPs associated with certain traits or pathologies are mapped to regulatory regions of the genome and affect gene expression by changing transcription factor binding sites. In recent decades, substantial effort has been invested in searching for such regulatory SNPs (rSNPs) and understanding the mechanisms by which they lead to phenotypic differences, primarily to individual differences in susceptibility to di seases and in sensitivity to drugs. The development of the NGS (next-generation sequencing) technology has contributed not only to the identification of a huge number of SNPs and to the search for their association (genome-wide association studies, GWASs) with certain diseases or phenotypic manifestations, but also to the development of more productive approaches to their functional annotation. It should be noted that the presence of an association does not allow one to identify a functional, truly disease-associated DNA sequence variant among multiple marker SNPs that are detected due to linkage disequilibrium. Moreover, determination of associations of genetic variants with a disease does not provide information about the functionality of these variants, which is necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the development of pathology and to design effective methods for its treatment and prevention. In this regard, the functional analysis of SNPs annotated in the GWAS catalog, both at the genome-wide level and at the level of individual SNPs, became especially relevant in recent years. A genome-wide search for potential rSNPs is possible without any prior knowledge of their association with a trait. Thus, mapping expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) makes it possible to identify an SNP for which – among transcriptomes of homozygotes and heterozygotes for its various alleles – there are differences in the expression level of certain genes, which can be located at various distances from the SNP. To predict rSNPs, approaches based on searches for allele-specific events in RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, DNase-seq, ATAC-seq, MPRA, and other data are also used. Nonetheless, for a more complete functional annotation of such rSNPs, it is necessary to establish their association with a trait, in particular, with a predisposition to a certain pathology or sensitivity to drugs. Thus, approaches to finding SNPs important for the development of a trait can be categorized into two groups: (1) starting from data on an association of SNPs with a certain trait, (2) starting from the determination of allele-specific changes at the molecular level (in a transcriptome or regulome). Only comprehensive use of strategically different approaches can considerably enrich our knowledge about the role of genetic determinants in the molecular mechanisms of trait formation, including predisposition to multifactorial diseases.
Publisher
Institute of Cytology and Genetics, SB RAS
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference125 articles.
1. Antontseva E.V., Matveeva M.Y., Bondar N.P., Kashina E.V., Leberfarb E.Y., Bryzgalov L.O., Gervas P.A., Ponomareva A.A., Cherdyntseva N.V., Orlov Y.L., Merkulova T.I. Regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms at the beginning of intron 2 of the human KRAS gene. J. Biosci. 2015;40(5):873883. DOI: 10.1007/s1203801595678. 2. Barbeira A.N., Bonazzola R., Gamazon E.R., Liang Y., Park Y., KimHellmuth S., Wang G., Jiang Z., Zhou D., Hormozdiari F., Liu B., Rao A., Hamel A.R., Pividori M.D., Aguet F., Bastarache L., Jordan D.M., Verbanck M., Do R., Stephens M., Ardlie K., McCarthy M., Montgomery S.B., Segrè A.V., Brown C.D., Lappalainen T., Wen X., Im H.K. Exploiting the GTEx resources to decipher the mechanisms at GWAS loci. Genome Biol. 2021;22(1):49. DOI: 10.1186/s13059020022524. 3. Boldes T., MerenbakhLamin K., Journo S., Shachar E., Lipson D., Yehes kel A., PasmanikChor M., Rubinek T., Wolf I. R269C va riant of ESR1: high prevalence and differential function in a subset of pancreatic cancers. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):531. DOI: 10.1186/s1288502007005x. 4. Boyle E.A., Li Y.I., Pritchard J.K. An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell. 2017;169(7):11771186. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.038. 5. Bryzgalov L.O., Antontseva E.V., Matveeva M.Y., Shilov A.G., Kashina E.V., Mordvinov V.A., Merkulova T.I. Detection of regulatory SNPs in human genome using ChIPseq ENCODE data. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78833. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078833.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|