Affiliation:
1. Kuban State Medical University
2. Kuban State Medical University; Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Hospital no. 1
3. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
4. Kuban State Medical University; Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Hospital no. 1, Krasnodar
Abstract
Objective To determine the ratio of the main growth factors when using various methods of local stimulation of reparative osteogenesis.Material and methods The study consisted of two parts: in the first part a comparative analysis of the content of growth factors by ELISA was carried out (PDGF – platelet derived growth factor, TGF – transforming growth factor, VEGF – vascular endothelial growth factor, IGF – insulin-like growth factor, BMP6 and BMP7 – morphogenetic proteins 6 and 7), capable of stimulating reparative osteogenesis in blood plasma, plateletrich plasma, red bone marrow and bone autoregenerate. The second part presented the results of approbation of the autoregenerate obtained according to the original method in the framework of an acute experiment on animals.Results The most important cytokines affecting the process of reparative osteogenesis are fibroblast growth factor – FGF1 and bone morphogenetic protein 7 – BMP7. Based on the results of a comparative enzymelinked immunosorbent assay, it has been established that the autoregenerate, obtained by the original method, and a bone marrow aspirate concentrate have the highest osteogenic potential.Conclusion Autoregenerate is an effective and promising means of local stimulation of reparative osteogenesis, and its transplantation is a simple and highly effective procedure.
Publisher
Scientific Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No 1
Reference15 articles.
1. Alekseenko SN, Redko AN, Karipidi RK, Zakharchenko YuI. Primary disability of the adult population of the Krasnodar region due to road traffic accidents. Bulletin of the All-Russian Society of Specialists 44 on Medical and Social Expertise, Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Industry. 2017;4:44–48. (In Russ.)
2. Blazhenko AN, Rodin IA, Ponkina ON, et al. The effect of A-PRP-therapy on reparative regeneration of bone tissue with acute bone fractures of the limbs. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2019;(3):32–38. https://doi.org/10.35401/2500-0268-2019-15-3- 32-38 (In Russ.)
3. Sadykov RI, Akhtyamov IF. Local factors of stimulations of reparative osteogenesis (literature review). Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2020;(3):23–30. http://doi. org/10.17238/issn2226-2016.2020.3.23-30 (In Russ.)
4. Miromanov AM, Gusev KA, Uskov SA, Davydov SO, Miromanova NA. Current approaches to diagnosis of fracture consolidation disorders. Genij Ortopedii. 2017;23(1):12–15. http:// doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2017-23-1-12-15 (In Russ.)
5. Shastov AL. Management of posttraumatic long bone defects in the national orthopedic practice (literature review). Genij Ortopedii. 2018;24(2):252–257. http://doi.org/10.18019/1028- 4427-2018-24-2-252-257 (In Russ.)