Affiliation:
1. Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
2. Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery; Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Healthcare Department
3. Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery
4. Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Healthcare Department; Petrovsky National Research Center of Surgery
5. Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Abstract
Objective: To determine the diagnostic significance of sonographic signs indicating the parotid glands’ condition in children with juvenile recurrent parotitis (JRP). Materials and methods: We examined 42 patients with JRP and 30 children aged 3-17 years from the control group. Both groups underwent B-mode and color Doppler ultrasonography of parotid glands to assess linear dimensions, contours, structures, echogenicity, pronouncement of the stromal component, parenchymal vascularization, and condition of intraglandular lymph nodes. The diagnostic significance of the sonographic signs was assessed by ROC analysis. Results and discussion: We found significant differences between the study and control groups in terms of such sonographic signs as gland enlargement, decreased parenchymal echogenicity, change in the echotexture, increased stromal component, increased parenchymal vascularization, and reactive parotid lymph nodes (P < .05). With the high-frequency probe we were able to study the structure of JRP-associated hypoechoic foci in the parenchyma and prove that they are not cystic dilatation of the ducts but foci of infiltration around the peripheral ducts with structurally altered walls. Conclusions: Ultrasonography plays a pivotal role in the JRP diagnosis and can identify its most significant sonographic signs, such as increased size, distinctive changes in the parenchymal echotexture, decreased echogenicity, and increased parenchymal vascularization.
Publisher
Scientific Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No 1
Reference15 articles.
1. Saarinen R, Kolho KL, Davidkin I, Pitkäranta A. The clinical picture of juvenile parotitis in a prospective setup. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(2):177–181. PMID: 22924783. doi: 10.1111/apa.12004
2. Afanasev VV. Sialadenitis (Etiology, Pathogenesis, Clinical Findings, Diagnosis and Treatment). Experimental and Clinical Study. Dissertation. Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; 1993:75–81. (In Russ.).
3. Miziara ID, Campelo VE. Infantile recurrent parotitis: follow up study of five cases and literature review. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;71(5):570–575. PMID: 16612516. PMCID: PMC9441967. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31259-3
4. Klinovskaya AS, Smyslenova MV, Gurgenadze AP, Loginopulo OV. The results of ultrasound studies of the children presenting with chronic parenchymatous parotitis and their parents. Rossiiskaya Stomatologiya. 2017;10(2):3–10. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/rosstomat20171023-10
5. Egorova TV, Malkova LV. Bilateral parotitis as a manifestation of autoimmune disease. Children Infections. 2019;18(1):63–67. (In Russ.). doi: 10.22627/2072-8107-2019-18-1-63-67