Analysis of ultrasonography and cytology potential in differential diagnosis of major salivary gland neoplasms

Author:

Polshikov S. V.1ORCID,Katrich A. N.2ORCID,Vetsheva N. N.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1

2. Scientific Research Institute – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1; Kuban State Medical University

3. Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Abstract

Background: Salivary gland tumors account for up to 5% of all head and neck neoplasms. Ultrasonography is one of the main diagnostic modalities for the salivary gland pathology; however, its diagnostic potential is under scrutiny. Fine needle aspiration cytology is considered the main diagnostic method, although its role in the differential diagnosis is disputable.Objective: To identify, based on morphology results, the effectiveness of the main ultrasonographic signs indicating major salivary gland neoplasms in the differential diagnosis and study these signs, to evaluate the effectiveness of fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of benign and malignant major salivary gland neoplasms.Materials and methods: This retrospective study evaluated a group of 220 patients. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of qualitative ultrasonographic signs of salivary gland neoplasms, analyzed the fine needle aspiration effectiveness, and compared results accuracy by calculating Pearson’s empirical χ-square.Results: Common ultrasonographic signs of benign salivary gland neoplasms included a clear contour (97.5%) and decreased echogenicity (72.7%). Malignant tumors frequently presented with a clear contour (76.7%), uneven contour (72.1%), and decreased echogenicity (69.8%). Fine needle aspiration sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of benign neoplasms were 75.5% and 53.6%, respectively. Fine needle aspiration sensitivity and specificity in respect of malignant tumors were 50% and 94%, respectively. Pearson’s χ-square value for the clear contour had significant differences in favor of benign neoplasms.Discussion: Benign and malignant salivary gland neoplasms often have a similar ultrasonographic pattern. A significant diagnostic sign of malignant tumors is the uneven contour. We compared the effectiveness of cytological differentiation between benign and malignant neoplasms and found high rates of specificity and accuracy for malignant tumor diagnosis.Conclusions: Clear contour and decreased echogenicity are significant ultrasonographic signs in the differentiation of benign neoplasms. Uneven contour is a significant differentiating factor for malignant neoplasms. Cytology can be used for initial morphology in diagnosing major salivary gland neoplasms, but in half of the cases it fails to identify the nature and type of the tumor.

Publisher

Scientific Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No 1

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Paches AI, Tabolinovskaya TD. Salivary Gland Tumors. Prakticheskaya Meditsina; 2009. (In Russ.).

2. Timofeev AA. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Textbook. VSI “Meditsina”; 2010. (In Russ.).

3. Hugh CD. Imaging of salivary gland. In: Myers EN, Ferris RL, eds. Salivary Gland Disorders. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg; 2007:17–32.

4. Ahuja AT. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Head and Neck. 2nd edition. Elsevier; 2019.

5. Lee YYP, Wong KT, King AD, Ahuja AT. Imaging of salivary gland tumours. Eur J Radiol. 2008;66(3):419–436. PMID: 18337041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.027

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3