Comparative analysis of outcome predictors in patients with postoperative peritonitis depending on the method of surgical treatment – relaparotomy on demand vs vacuum-assisted laparostomy

Author:

Uvarov I. B.1ORCID,Sichinava D. D.2ORCID,Manuilov A. M.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kuban State Medical University; Clinical Oncology Dispensary no. 1

2. Clinical Oncology Dispensary no. 1

3. Kuban State Medical University

Abstract

Background: Secondary postoperative diffuse peritonitis (SPDP) is one of the most severe complications of elective and emergency surgical interventions associated with a high mortality rate. To date, no optimal tactics of surgical treatment of SPDP has been developed.Objective: The analysis of independent predictors of outcome depending on the method of surgical treatment – relaparotomy ondemand (RD) or vacuum-assisted laparostomy (VAL).Material and methods: The study included 141 adult patients, male and female in the period from January 2014 to December 2020: group I (n = 63) – patients who received VAL method; group II (n = 78) – RD method. The method of multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the independent effects of potential predictor variables on the treatment outcome.Results: The following independent predictors of treatment outcome in the RD group were identified: age, duration of hospital stay, number of relaparotomies, APACHE II score, Björck classification grade 1C at the 1st sanitation, bacteremia, Clavien–Dindo complications class 3a and 4a. For the VAL group: conversion of surgical tactics and bacteremia.Conclusion: In patients with SPDP in the presence of risk factors for unfavorable outcomes, the use of VAL with staged sanitation of the abdominal cavity is indicated.

Publisher

Scientific Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No 1

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3