Affiliation:
1. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ
2. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ, BİYOİSTATİSTİK (DR)
Abstract
Background: The prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary premolars in non-syndromic Turkish children between 6-18 years of age was investigated in this retrospective study through CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) analysis.
Methods: CBCT images of 48 patients with at least one supernumerary premolar were evaluated in 1012 images of patients referred between 2015 and 2020. The localization, number, eruption state, shape, the position of supernumerary premolar, concomitant other dental anomalies, associated complications, and the presence of resorption on the nearest adjacent teeth were recorded. The statistical analysis of possible associated factors with resorption was performed by the Chi-square test and Logistic regression.
Results: The prevalence of supernumerary premolars was 4.7%. A total of 107 supernumerary premolars in 48 patients with mean age of 15.02 2.24 were analyzed. Compared to single supernumerary premolar, multiple supernumerary premolars were more prevalent (62.5%). The concomitant dental anomalies such as pulp stones, mesiodens were observed in fifteen patients (31.2%). Most of the supernumerary premolars were impacted, supplemental shaped and vertical position. The most common complication associated with supernumerary premolars was root resorption (56.4%) of neighborhood teeth. Supernumerary premolars with immature roots induced significantly higher resorption percentages than only crown ones (P = 0.002). Also, the root resorption of adjacent teeth due to supernumerary premolars was significantly higher in children over 13 years of age (P < 0.001).
Conclusions: The prevalence and three-dimensional radiographic characteristics of supernumerary premolars in non-syndromic Turkish children offer valuable information to the literature and highlight the possible complications.
Reference18 articles.
1. 1. Garvey MT, Barry HJ, Blake M. Supernumerary teeth-an overview of classification, diagnosis and management. J Can Dent Assoc 1999; 65: 612-616.
2. 2. Solares R, Romero MI. Supernumerary premolars: a literature review. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 450-458.
3. 3. Mossaz J, Kloukos D, Pandis N, Suter VG, Katsaros C, Bornstein MM. Morphologic characteristics, location, and associated complications of maxillary and mandibular supernumerary teeth as evaluated using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36: 708-718.
4. 4. Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome Turkish population: associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: 575-8.
5. 5. Öztaş B, Bardak Ç, Kurşun EŞ, Akbulut N. Clinical characteristics of non-syndromic supernumerary teeth in a cohort of Turkish patients. Oral Radiol 2011; 27: 108-113.