Abstract
The relationship of a speaker’s language to their sense of place has been a focus of much of the sociolinguistic literature and dialect studies. However, the use of differing methodologies and measures makes comparison and contrast of the importance of place across different communities and social contexts problematic and drawing overarching conclusions challenging. To resolve this, the current article presents a way to quantitatively measure place-attachment using a Rootedness Metric that is both adaptable and comparable, permitting more nuanced understandings of place and language. Through three case studies, the author presents evidence that demonstrates the effectiveness of the Rootedness Metric to better understand how attachment to place impacts the phonetic variation in Appalachia. Inclusion of rootedness helps to explain why demographically similar speakers have divergent production, while the production of dissimilar speakers patterns alike.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Communication
Reference47 articles.
1. Appalachian Regional Commission
. 2002. “Subregions in Appalachia.” http://www.arc.gov/images/maps/22512_Subregions.pdf.
2. Dialectal Variation in the Rising Accents of American English;Arvaniti,2007
3. What We Talk about When We Talk about the South;Ayers,1996
4. Bailey
Guy
Wikle
Tom
Tillery
Jan
Sand
Lori
. 1993. “Some Patterns of Linguistic Diffusion.” Language Variation and Change5, no. 3 (Oct.): 359–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450000154X.
5. Beckman
Mary E.
Elam
Gayle Ayers
. 1997. “Guidelines for ToBI Labelling.” Extract available at https://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/research/phonetics/E_ToBI/.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献