Inclosure and Intolerance-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Inclosure and Intolerance

Published:2021-05-01 Issue:2 Volume:62 Page:
ISSN:0029-4527
Container-title:Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
language:
Short-container-title:Notre Dame J. Formal Logic

Author:

Oms Sergi¹,Zardini Elia²

Affiliation:

1. Logos Group/BIAP, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08001, Spain

2. Department of Logic and Theoretical Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain; and International Laboratory for Logic, Linguistics and Formal Philosophy, School of Philosophy and Cultural Studies, Nation

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Logic

Reference34 articles.

1. Priest, G., In Contradiction, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.

2. Zardini, E., “Naive truth and naive logical properties,” Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 7 (2014), pp. 351–84.

3. Asenjo, F. G., “A calculus of antinomies,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 7 (1966), pp. 103–5.

4. Beall, J. C., “Finding tolerance without gluts,” Mind, vol. 123 (2014), pp. 791–811.

5. Beall, J. C., “End of inclosure,” Mind, vol. 123 (2014), pp. 829–49.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Neoclassical Logic, Cloisonnist Vagueness, Nonobjectual Truth;Synthese Library;2024

2. Qua-Objects, (Non-)Derivative Properties and the Consistency of Hylomorphism;Metaphysica;2023-08-07

3. Some Remarks on the Notion of Paradox;Acta Analytica;2022-07-05

4. Substructural approaches to paradox: an introduction to the special issue;Synthese;2021-12