Undue Burdens: State Abortion Laws in the United States, 1994–2022

Author:

Roth Louise Marie1,Lee Jennifer Hyunkyung1

Affiliation:

1. University of Arizona

Abstract

Abstract State laws have influenced access to abortion in the 50 years since Roe v. Wade. The 2022 Dobbs decision returned questions about the legality of abortion to the states, which increased the importance of state laws for abortion access. The objective of this study is to illustrate trends in abortion-restrictive and abortion-supportive state laws using a unique longitudinal database of reproductive health laws across the United States from 1994 to 2022. This study offers a descriptive analysis of historical trends in state-level pre-viability abortion bans, abortion method bans, efforts to dissuade abortion, TRAP (targeted regulation of abortion providers) laws, other laws that restrict reproductive choice, and laws that expand abortion access and support reproductive health. Data sources include state statutes (from Nexis Uni) and secondary sources. The data reveal that pre-viability bans, including gestation-based bans and total bans, became significantly more prevalent over time. Other abortion-restrictive laws increased from 1994 to 2022, but states also passed a growing number of laws that support reproductive health. Increasing polarization into abortion-restrictive and abortion-supportive states characterized the 1994–2022 period. These trends have implications for maternal and infant health and for racial/ethnic and income disparities.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Health Policy

Reference32 articles.

1. Arons Jessica . 2019. “The Last Clinics Standing.” American Civil Liberties Union. https://www.aclu.org/issues/reproductive-freedom/abortion/last-clinics-standing (accessed February21, 2023).

2. Constructing a Longitudinal Database of Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers Laws;Austin;Health Services Research,2019

3. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, and United Nations Population Division Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2015;Bongaarts;Population and Development Review,2016

4. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Obstetric Outcomes and Care: Prevalence and Determinants.”;Bryant;American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2010

5. Carr Lindsey . 2022. “Abortion Trigger Bans Take Effect in 3 States.” Contemporary OB/GYN, August30. https://www.contemporaryobgyn.net/view/abortion-trigger-bans-take-effect-in-3-states.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3