Filling the Organ Donor Pool by Giving Priority

Author:

Meng Matthew D.1,Clarke Roberta N.2

Affiliation:

1. Utah State University

2. Boston University

Abstract

Abstract Context: Many of the alternatives for procuring donor organs are considered either ineffective, unethical, or illegal. One possibility that may not face such challenges is a priority system whereby individuals who register as an organ donor are given priority to receive an organ over those who have not registered. However, providing extrinsic rewards can sometimes paradoxically reduce the target behavior, especially for those who are more altruistically motivated. Methods: Two behavioral experiments were employed and data were analyzed using regressions as well as examining open-ended responses. Findings: The results suggest that giving priority to receive an organ to those who register to donate postmortem could increase overall registration rates. Further, the effect of providing priority appears to work by inducing anticipated regret, which can be used to overcome common obstacles to registration. Finally, it was found that a priority system is most effective in increasing donor rates for those individuals who are less altruistically motivated and does not reduce registration rates for those who are more altruistically motivated. Conclusions: Given the unabated shortage of transplant organs, the finding that a priority system could increase the willingness to register as a donor without crowding out altruistically motivated individuals is highly encouraging.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Health Policy

Reference56 articles.

1. Alcorn Ted . 2018. “Thousands of Organs Are Lost before They Can Be Donated. Here's How to Save Them.” Vox, March25. www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/4/23/17267884/organ-donation-transplant-liver-kidney.

2. ANES (American National Election Studies). n.d. “Liberal-Conservative Self-Identification 1972–2016.” ANES Guide to Public Opinion and Electoral Behavior. electionstudies.org/resources/anes-guide/top-tables/?id=29 (accessed August20, 2019).

3. Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving;Andreoni;Economic Journal,1990

4. Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially;Ariely;American Economic Review,2009

5. AOPO (Association of Organ Procurement Organizations). n.d. “Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Data.” Data on Donation and Transplantation. www.aopo.org/related-links-data-on-donation-and-transplantation/ (accessed August20, 2019).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3