The Grassroots of Grass: Cannabis Legalization Ballot Initiative Campaign Contributions and Outcomes, 2004–2016

Author:

Orenstein Daniel G.1,Glantz Stanton A.1

Affiliation:

1. University of California, San Francisco

Abstract

Abstract Context: As of November 2018, medical cannabis was legal in 33 US states and recreational cannabis in 10, mostly enacted via ballot initiative. Methods: We identified 32 cannabis legalization initiatives from 2004 to 2016 and obtained campaign contribution and state political and demographic data. After exploratory analyses of 15 potential independent variables, we quantified effects of 4 factors (initiative year, voter turnout, population born before 1946, advocate funding advantage) on voter support and likelihood of passage. Findings: A small number of campaign contributors dominated both sides of the issue, with little involvement by health advocates. Time and turnout, not money, were the factors most associated with electoral outcomes, consistent with increases in public opinion favoring cannabis legalization over time. Year, turnout, and population age were associated with voter support, while year, turnout, and advocate funding advantage were associated with likelihood of passage. When adjusting for an anomalous result, initiative year was the only variable that remained significantly associated with odds of passage, with a 1-year increase in initiative date associated with 2.02 times higher odds of passage (p < .01). Conclusion: These results underscore the importance of health advocate participation in developing cannabis legalization frameworks.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Health Policy

Reference46 articles.

1. American Public Health Association. 2014. “Regulating Commercially Legalized Marijuana as a Public Health Priority.” Policy Statements, policy no. 201410, November18. www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2015/01/23/10/17/regulating-commercially-legalized-marijuana-as-a-public-health-priority.

2. Arkansas Ethics Commission. n.d. “Local-Option/Ballot/Legislative Question Committee Filings.” www.arkansasethics.com/blqc.htm (accessed March19, 2018).

3. Ballotpedia. n.d. “Marijuana on the Ballot.” ballotpedia.org/Marijuana_on_the_ballot (accessed February20, 2018).

4. Barry Rachel Ann , and GlantzStanton. 2016. “A Public Health Framework for Legalized Retail Marijuana Based on the US Experience: Avoiding a New Tobacco Industry.” PLoS Med13, no. 9: e1002131. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002131.

5. Marijuana Regulatory Frameworks in Four US States: An Analysis against a Public Health Standard;Barry;American Journal of Public Health,2018

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3