Abstract
The Wagner Act, passed by a Democratic-controlled Congress in 1935, provided unprecedented federal protections for American labor unions. The Taft-Hartley Act, passed by a Republican-controlled Congress just twelve years later, effectively rolled back significant parts of Wagner. Previous research on Taft-Hartley identifies three factors that led to this anti-labor backlash. First, the American public was repulsed by the large strike wave that followed the end of World War II. Second, southern Democrats were concerned that powerful labor unions would organize African Americans and upset the South's racial hierarchy. Third, the Republican Party was increasingly embracing a conservative, probusiness ideology. This article contributes a new angle to this old debate by exploring the role of the CIO, its 1943 decision to create the country's first political action committee (PAC), and the consequences of its informal alliance with the Democratic Party. Using original data on CIO density and congressional voting on the Taft-Hartley Act, we demonstrate that CIO strength polarized the parties: higher levels of CIO density led Democrats to vote in favor of organized labor but led Republicans to vote in an increasingly anti-labor manner.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Industrial relations,History
Reference99 articles.
1. The Collapse of Organized Labor;Adamic;Harper's,1932
2. Arnold
Delbert D.
“The CIO's Role in American Politics, 1936–1948.” PhD diss., University of Maryland, College Park, 1952.
3. The Political Economy of the Wagner Act: Power, Symbol, and Workplace Cooperation;Barenberg;Harvard Law Review,1993
4. Revisiting Public Opinion in the 1930s and 1940s;Berinsky;PS: Political Science and Politics,2011
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献