Abstract
Archaeology conducted at sites of labor offers the possibility for new modes of historical inquiry. As a method of recovering unrecorded aspects of the past, archaeology provides a vital set of tools for understanding the everyday lives of peripheralized laborers, immigrants, and working-class communities. As both a material science and a social science, it opens this history up to new research questions. Furthermore, the tactile quality of material evidence recovered through archaeology affords researchers new ways to engage public audiences on a variety of levels. The National Park Service’s Labor Archeology of the Industrial Era National Historic Landmark Theme Study offers one framework and context for assessing the significance and integrity of the nation’s sites of labor. Public archaeology projects, such as the Lattimer Archaeology Project in Lattimer, Pennsylvania, on the site of an immigrant shantytown that witnessed a notorious labor massacre, represent another example of the literal and figurative excavation of labor and working-class history. Performed in collaboration local stakeholders, the project used the tools of archaeology and material culture to link historical oppression to present-day injustices in one postindustrial community.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Industrial relations,History
Reference54 articles.
1. The Social Order of the Anthracite Region, 1825–1902;Berthoff;Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography,1965
2. China Camp;Bingham,1978
3. Landscapes of Resistance: A View of the Nineteenth-Century Chesapeake Bay Oyster Fishery;Botwick;Historical Archaeology,2005