Abstract
Abstract
This article addresses a pervasive but undertheorized literacy practice: ghostwriting. Drawing on a five-year interview study with undergraduate students, I describe the many ghostwriting tasks that participants were asked to perform for their co-op jobs and how they perceived those tasks. Overall, students were bewildered by ghostwriting and found it very different from, and in some ways at odds with, their academic writing. Given the ubiquity of ghostwriting and the likelihood that much of it will be offloaded to artificial intelligence in coming years, I call for and begin to outline a critical pedagogical approach to ghostwriting grounded in critical language awareness.
Reference41 articles.
1. Critical Language Awareness in the United States: Revisiting Issues and Revising Pedagogies in a Resegregated Society;Alim;Educational Researcher,2005
2. The Design of Web 2.0: The Rise of the Template, The Fall of Design;Arola;Computers and Composition,2010
3. Corporate ghostwriting;Bankhead;Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication,1995
4. Ethics of Ghostwritten Speeches;Bormann;Quarterly Journal of Speech,1961
5. Exorcising Ghostwriting. . . .;Bosch;EMBO reports,2011