Author:
Carter Jaclyn,Clarke Michael Tavel,Halpern Faye,Mason Derritt,Nicol Jessica,Vanek Morgan
Abstract
Abstract
The activity of close reading lies at the heart of literary studies, a “signature pedagogy” that distinguishes English from other disciplines. Despite its centrality to the discipline, however, close reading has been curiously resistant to analysis. This lesson study aimed to determine where students encounter challenges in close reading. Contrary to dominant narratives in the discipline, the university students in this study were adept at formal analysis. They were challenged, on the other hand, by invitations to make intertextual and personal connections to the text. Analyzing features of successful close reading, the essay proposes that intertextual thinking and personal connection are important components. The essay recommends assessing student skills in the initial stages of teaching close reading and, when warranted, integrating instruction in intertextual thinking and making personal connections alongside formal analysis. It also suggests group discussion may help leverage these neglected components of close reading.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Education,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies
Reference35 articles.
1. The Singularity of Literature
2. Why Should Students Want to Do a Close Reading?;Beltramo;Voices from the Middle,2015
3. Here Follows Some Verses upon the Burning of Our House, July 10th, 1666;Bradstreet,2012
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献