Engaging across Boundaries—emerging Practices in ‘Technical Democracy’-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Engaging across Boundaries—emerging Practices in ‘Technical Democracy’

Published:2010-12-01 Issue:4 Volume:4 Page:475-482
ISSN:1875-2160
Container-title:East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal

Author:

Du Plessis Rosemary¹,Hindmarsh Richard²³,Cronin Karen⁴

Affiliation:

1. Sociology Programme, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

2. Centre for Governance and Public Policy, Griffith University, Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia

3. Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Kessels Rd, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia

4. Science, Technology and Society, Social Systems Group, Environmental Science and Research (ESR), PO Box 50 348, Porirua, Wellington, New Zealand

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

General Social Sciences

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1215/s12280-010-9157-7

Reference22 articles.

1. Introduction: Public Participation in Science and Technology in East Asia

2. Street Science

3. Cronin K. (2008). Deliberative dialogue for sustainable biotechnology governance in New Zealand. Research Report prepared for the University of Waikato research programme on Socially and Culturally Sustainable Biotechnology in New Zealand. http://wms-soros.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/Biotechnology/Publications/default.htm, (accessed 12 November 2009).

4. What is Political in Sub-politics?

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Rethinking Australian CSG transitions in participatory contexts of local social conflict, community engagement, and shifts towards cleaner energy;Energy Policy;2019-09

2. Technical democracy as a challenge to urban studies;City;2016-07-03

3. Hot air ablowin! ‘Media-speak’, social conflict, and the Australian ‘decoupled’ wind farm controversy;Social Studies of Science;2013-10-22