Abstract
This article offers a brief history of “sovereignty,” unmooring it from Western governance and the right to kill, in order to trace the life of the term within the field of Native (Indigenous) politics and Studies. Within this field, the practice of “critique” is central, examining conditions of dispossession and exploitation within other disciplines that refuse or devalue knowledge about Indigenous peoples. Historically, “critique” has been vital to Native and Indigenous Studies, which emerged from the liberatory and resistant politics of the late sixties and seventies across North America, as well as from decolonization movements and the specificities (and sovereignties) of Indian country. A developing field at that moment, Native and Indigenous Studies saw that the needs of Indigenous communities were tied directly to forms of resistance and redress but as well to the terrains of knowledge within contemporary academic institutions. As such, disciplinary formation and the critique, if not dismantling of dispossessing disciplines, became key sites for liberation, along with lands and waters.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies
Reference45 articles.
1. Andrew-Gee Eric . 2017. “The Making of Joseph Boyden.” Globe and Mail, November12. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/joseph-boyden/article35881215/.
2. For Whom Sovereignty Matters;Barker,2006
3. Barrera Jorge . 2016. “Author Joseph Boyden’s Shape-shifting Indigenous Identity.” aptnnews.ca, December23. https://aptnnews.ca/2016/12/23/author-joseph-boydens-shape-shifting-indigenous-identity.
4. Introduction: What’s Changed, What Hasn’t;Biolsi,2007
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献