Advocacy and Activism for Health Care Providers in a Post-Roe World

Author:

Perritt Jamila,Scencirro Andriana N.

Abstract

Although the work of health care providers in delivering care for their patients and communities has always been impacted by legislative changes, reproductive health care services, especially abortion care, has received more scrutiny, undergone disparate and excessive attempts at overregulation, and has been subject to more restrictions than most fields of medicine. The June 2022 Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, essentially overturning the federal constitutional protections of the legal right to access abortion afforded by the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, has brought this issue to the forefront for many clinicians across sectors and disciplines. As trusted voices, physicians and other health care providers are uniquely positioned to discuss the implications of policies that restrict access to comprehensive reproductive health care, including abortion services, as they bear witness to the challenges this creates for them in practice and the communities they care for. This article discusses the impact of the Dobbs ruling on medical providers and their patients as well as the responsibility of health care providers to advocate for abortion access.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Reference19 articles.

1. “Abortion Bans across the Country: Tracking Restrictions by State.” 2022. New York Times, November7. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html.

2. The Ad Council. 2022. Americans Trust Medical Pros, Family, on Societal Issues. February3. https://www.adcouncil.org/press-releases/new-study-reveals-most-americans-look-to-medical-professionals-for-trusted-information-on-social-societal-issues-after-family.

3. All Above All. n.d. EACH Act Fact Sheet. https://allaboveall.org/resource/each-act-fact-sheet/.

4. American Association of Medical Colleges. n.d. “Table C6: Physician Retention in State of Residency Training, by State.” AAMC. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/data/table-c6-physician-retention-state-residency-training-state (accessed February19, 2024).

5. American Association of Medical Colleges. 2022. “AAMC Statement on Supreme Court Decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.” June24. https://www.aamc.org/news/press-releases/aamc-statement-supreme-court-decision-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3