Abstract
AbstractThis article is a call to render the rare modicums, odd classifications, and normalization of indigenous slave practices in documents legible and then magnify them and connect them to broader considerations of slavery. Statistical anomalies and unusual stories found in archives are, in fact, central to the assessments of the enormity and depth of indigenous slavery. Moreover, the appearance of outliers in documents helps to address some of the methodological and conceptual frameworks that limit understandings of indigeneity in the early modern period.
Reference78 articles.
1. Arena Carolyn Marie . 2017. “Indian Slaves from Caribana: Trade and Labor in the Seventeenth-Century Caribbean.” PhD diss., Columbia University.
2. La esclavitud de los aborígenes en el Reino de Chile y el Padrón de Montesclaros (1613–1614);Arenas Uriarte;Revista del Archivo General de la Nación,2001
3. For the Record
4. In the Absence of Reliable Ghosts: Sexuality, Historiography, South Asia;Arondekar;Differences,2014
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献