Affiliation:
1. University of Bonn, Germany; Rio de Janeiro State University, Brazil
Abstract
Abstract
For decades, historiography on the Iberian empires has suggested that peace treaties between Europeans and autonomous Native groups incorporated both Indigenous “nations,” understood as cohesive units, and Native lands into the monarchy. Drawing on extensive archival evidence and recent borderlands scholarship, this article suggests that written agreements had a limited impact on interethnic frontier relations. First, because informal relations shaped by Indigenous patterns of diplomacy were far more important to the success of alliances. Second, because alliances were often made with autonomous tolderías, not with homogeneous “nations.” And third, because Natives by no means identified their ethnic territories with Crown possessions, but continued to independently exploit Iberian rivalries in order to achieve more favorable conditions for themselves. This article focuses on the frontier between the Spanish province of Paraguay and the Portuguese captaincy of Mato Grosso.
Reference66 articles.
1. Diario del Capitán de Fragata de la Real Armada;Aguirre;Revista de la Biblioteca Nacional,1950
2. Araujo
Renata Malcher de
. 2000. “A urbanização do Mato Grosso no século XVIII: Discurso e método.” 2 vols. PhD diss., Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
3. Geografía física y esférica de las Provincias del Paraguay, y Misiones Guaraníes;Azara,1904
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献