Affiliation:
1. Latin American Studies Program, Bucknell University, USA
Abstract
Abstract
What does it mean to resort to neoliberal environmental approaches to heal the socio-ecological devastation wrought by fascistic forces? In Brazil extremist right-wing efforts to impose sovereign state rule over Amazonia have resulted in rampant deforestation, violence against forest peoples, and a catastrophic COVID-19 pandemic. Some environmentalists suggest that escaping such devastation means returning to previous neoliberal policies such as “climate-smart agriculture” (CSA) that were promoted as a way to open a future of endless economic expansion and forest preservation. Rejecting the choice between fascistic and neoliberal environmental approaches, this article examines the future-oriented work of Amazonian environmentalists who grapple with “disjointed times” in which economic and ecological trends resist harmonization. Attentive to multispecies and multi-temporal dynamics, they suggest ways to avoid a temporal trap wherein the catastrophic failure of anthropocentric future-making projects always calls for yet another anthropocentric future-making project.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Ecology
Reference86 articles.
1. ActionAid International et al. “Corporate-Smart Greenwash: Why We Reject the Global Alliance on Climate-Smart Agriculture.” September 2014. Third World Network. www.twn.my/title2/climate/info.service/2014/cc140903.htm (accessed May21, 2021).
2. Timescapes of Modernity
3. The Promise of Infrastructure
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献