Abstract
AbstractThrough digital ethnography of the mass uprising against Myanmar's early-2021 military coup, this article considers appeals to “the international community,” in which activists maneuver the simultaneous potential and peril of global entreaties, deploying a double-move of contradictory thrusts. To continue stoking the possibility of international intervention, activists reiterate demands while intensifying their affective content; conversely, they use anticipated failure of those appeals to “boomerang” them back to local publics—making the international a present-but-effaced addressee. They engage in the jouissance of abandonment, coordinate (potentially violent) tactics, shame their enemies, and engage in political debate on the objectives of their ongoing struggle. By retaining the key mediatory role vis-à-vis Myanmar publics, activists enact an alternative relationship with the international, one that invites intervention but is not dependent on it.
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Communication,Social Psychology
Reference109 articles.
1. Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others;Abu-Lughod;American Anthropologist,2002
2. Al Jazeera. 2021. “Outcry in Myanmar as Military Airs Images of ‘Tortured’ Detainees.” April19. www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/19/outcry-in-myanmar-as-military-airs-images-of-tortured-detainees.
3. Martyr Bodies in the Media: Human Rights, Aesthetics, and the Politics of Immediation in the Palestinian Intifada;Allen;American Ethnologist,2009