Affiliation:
1. Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza, Università degli Studi di Pisa, via del Collegio Ricci 10, 56126 Pisa, Italy (carlo.cristiano@unipi.it)
Abstract
Abstract
In a note appearing in the August 2024 issue of History of Political Economy (HOPE), Edward Nelson argues that a passage commenting on James Forder's Macroeconomics and the Phillips Curve Myth (2014) in a 2023 HOPE article by Carlo Cristiano titled “The Early Reception of the Phillips Curve in the United Kingdom” would provide a false characterization of the economic literature and claims priority in affirming that UK policymakers did not use the Phillips curve as a menu for policy. It is shown in this reply that Nelson's reading of Cristiano's 2023 article, and more specifically of the passage commenting on Forder's 2014 book, is based on a misunderstanding. The purpose of the 2023 article was not to show that UK policymakers did not use the Phillips trade-off as a menu for policy. In that article, consensus on this point is taken for granted. It is also argued in this reply that there is no need to mention Nelson's works to affirm that UK policymakers did not use the Phillips trade-off as a policy menu and that Nelson's works are indeed very relevant, but for other reasons.
Reference34 articles.
1. Behavioral Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Behavior;Akerlof;American Economic Review,2002
2. Rationalizing Incomes Policy in Britain, 1948–1979;Backhouse,2013
3. Beggs, M.
2010. “Inflation and the Making of Macroeconomic Policy in Australia, 1945–85.” PhD diss., University of Sidney.