Abstract
Abstract
Theorists working within the Frankfurt School tradition of critical theory have not been immune to calls to “decolonize” that have been circulating in and beyond the academic world. This article asks what it means to seek to decolonize a tradition of thought that has never explicitly acknowledged colonial histories. What is needed, instead, this article suggests, is consideration of the very implications of the “colonial modern”—that is, an acknowledgement of the colonial constitution of modernity—for Frankfurt School critical theory's idea of historical progress. The issue is more extensive than simply acknowledging the substantive neglect of colonialism within the tradition; rather, this article suggests that its categories of critique and their associated normative claims are also necessarily implicated by this neglect and require transformation. Acknowledgment of colonial histories requires material reparations for the substantive inequalities bequeathed as legacies of the past, but these reparations also require a transformation of understandings and a recognition of “epistemological justice.”
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Adorno, Foucault, and the End of Progress: Critical Theory in Postcolonial Times;Allen,2017
2. The End of Progress
3. Colonial State Crimes and the CARICOM Mobilization for Reparation and Justice;Atiles-Osoria;State Crime Journal,2018
4. Césaire with Adorno: Critical Theory and the Colonial Problem;Bardawil;South Atlantic Quarterly,2018
Cited by
61 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献