Abstract
Abstract
The practice of feigning weeping in devotional contexts, including in hortatory preaching, is closely associated in Egypt with Islamic Revivalism. It is an expression of pious humility through which worshippers pretend to cry in order to (ideally) develop the embodied capacity to shed tears in the future. Secular Egyptians tend to dismiss such weeping as insincere, but so, too, do many participants in the piety movement in a specific context: on-camera weeping. Drawing on fieldwork with Islamic television preachers and their followers in Cairo, this article explores how the mass-mediated artifice of preacherly weeping provokes expressions of religious ambivalence about an otherwise authoritative ritual practice. While televised tears facilitate the sense of intimacy that many viewers identify as key to their religious adherence, the preacher's lachrymose passion as dramaturgical enskillment coexists uneasily with the pious discipline of sincere self-cultivation. Understanding why this is so illuminates the changing criteria for ritual aptness in a mass media age.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference46 articles.
1. Al-MuhainiMamdouh. “Were Amr Khaled's Prayers Genuine?” Al Arabiya English, September 7, 2017. english.alarabiya.net/views/news/middle-east/2017/09/07/Were-Amr-Khaled-s-prayers-genuine-.
2. Public Tears: Populism and the Politics of Emotion in AKP'S Turkey;Aslan;International Journal of Middle East Studies,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献