Abstract
Abstract
This article discusses the rise and failure of private horticultural farming by Palestinian leaders and middle-class developers in the Beisan valley in the 1930s. This focus broadens and deepens our understanding of the colonial encounter in Palestine. Although the Palestinian middle class appears prominently in the political narratives of the struggle, this group has been paradoxically deemphasized in the social history of capital and settler accumulation and dispossession. By correcting this bias, the article seeks to develop a more inclusive narrative concerning private property in land in the settler-colonial predicament as a process of double loss: of Indigenous land relations and ecologies, on the one hand, and national life and territory, on the other. To do so, the article privileges an actor-based history, which captures both the development of political and economic practices and traditions, as well as the long and deep effects of governmental structures of dispossession.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference67 articles.
1. Mulkiyyat aal Sursuq fi Filistin 1869–1948” (“The Properties of the Sursuq Family in Palestine 1869–1948”);Abu Bakr;An-Najah University Journal for Research—B (Humanities),2004
2. The Tenants of Wadi Hawarith: Another View of the Land Question in Palestine;Adler;International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies,1988
3. Levantine Joint-Stock Companies, Trans-Mediterranean Partnerships, and Nineteenth-Century Capitalist Development;Alff;Comparative Studies in Society and History,2018
4. The Surrogate Colonization of Palestine, 1917–1939;Atran;American Ethnologist,1989
5. Writing/Righting Palestine Studies: Settler Colonialism, Indigenous Sovereignty, and Resisting the Ghost(s) of History;Barakat;Settler Colonial Studies,2018