Abstract
A century of gold and uranium mining hollowed out South Africa's Witwatersrand plateau. After the closure of these mines, water rose through the shafts, spilling acid mine drainage loaded with uranium, arsenic, and other harmful metals onto agricultural fields and into drinking water. The problem had been known since the sixteenth century, but industry experts consistently downplayed the damage by manufacturing ignorance through timeworn strategies of residual governance. They selectively and misleadingly invoked international norms and regulatory standards for radiation exposure to justify inaction. For citizens, the postapartheid government had betrayed its promise to provide a safe environment for all. Activists and their allies pushed hard against the strategies of residual governance, eventually winning treatment plants to neutralize the water. This chemical solution, however, didn't fully address the damage wrought by contaminated water.
Reference342 articles.
1. Fancies Idle.;Abrahams,1973
2. Water, Mining and Waste: An Historical and Economic Perspective on Conflict Management in South Africa.;Adler;Economics of Peace and Security Journal,2007
3. De re metallica. Translated from the first Latin ed. of 1556, with biographical introd., annotations, and appendices upon the development of mining methods, metallurgical processes, geology, mineralogy & mining law fr
4. Complexities with Extractive Industries Regulation on the African Continent: What Has ‘Best Practice’ Legislation Delivered in South Africa?;Alberts;Extractive Industries and Society,2017