Antiproliferative potential, quantitative structure-activity relationship, cheminformatic and molecular docking analysis of quinoline and benzofuran derivatives
-
Published:2020-09-30
Issue:3
Volume:11
Page:223-234
-
ISSN:2153-2257
-
Container-title:European Journal of Chemistry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Eur J Chem
Author:
Kumar Praveen1ORCID, Uthaiah Chinnappa Apattira2ORCID, Mahantheshappa Santhosha Sangapurada3ORCID, Satyanarayan Nayak Devappa3ORCID, Madhunapantula SubbaRao Venkata2ORCID, Kumar Hulikal Shivashankara Santhosh4ORCID, Achur Rajeshwara1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Biochemistry, Kuvempu University, Jnana Sahyadri, Shimoga, Karnataka, 577451, India 2. Center of Excellence in Molecular Biology and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara Medical College, Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, 570015, India 3. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Kuvempu University Post Graduate Centre, Kadur, Karnataka-577548, India 4. Department of Biotechnology, Kuvempu University, Jnana Sahyadri, Shimoga, Karnataka, 577451, India
Abstract
Quinoline and benzofuran moieties are commonly used for the synthesis of therapeutically beneficial molecules and drugs since they possess a wide range of pharmacological activities including potent anticancer activity as compared to other heterocyclic compounds. Many of well-known antimalarial, antimicrobial, anti-helminthic, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antiprotozoal, and antitumor compounds contain quinoline/benzofuran skeleton. The aim of this study was to analyze ten new quinoline and eighteen benzofuran derivatives for carcinoma cell line growth inhibition and to predict possible interactions with the target. The anticancer activity of these compounds against colon cancer (HCT-116) and triple-negative breast cancer (MDA-MB-468) cell lines was determined and performed molecular docking to predict the possible interactions. Among ten quinoline derivatives, Q1, Q4, Q6, Q9, and Q10 were found to be the most potent against HCT-116 and MDA-MB-468 with IC50 values ranging from 6.2-99.6 and 2.7-23.6 μM, respectively. Using the IC50 values, a model equation with quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) was generated with their descriptors such as HBA1, HBA2, kappa (1, 2 and 3), Balaban index, Wiener index, number of rotatable bonds, log S, log P and total polar surface area (TPSA). The effect of benzofuran derivatives was moderate in cytotoxicity tests and hence only quinolines were considered for further analysis. The molecular docking indicated the mammalian / mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), Topoisomerase I and II as possible targets for these molecules. The predicted results obtained from QSAR and molecular docking analysis of quinoline derivatives showed high correlation in comparison to the results of the cytotoxic assay. Overall, this study indicated that quinolines are more potent as anticancer agents compared to benzofurans. Further, compound Q9 has emerged as a lead molecule which could be the base for further development of more potent anticancer agents.
Publisher
European Journal of Chemistry
Reference46 articles.
1. [1]. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram. I.; Siegel, R. L.; Torre, L. A.; Jemal, A. CA-Cancer J. Clinic. 2018, 68(6), 394-424. 2. [2]. Mukherjee, A. K.; Basu, S.; Sarkar, N.; Ghosh, A. C. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8(12), 1467-1486. 3. [3]. Janku, F.; McConkey, D. J.; Hong, D. S.; Kurzrock, R. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 8(9), 528-539. 4. [4]. Green, J. A.; Kirwan, J. J.; Tierney. J.; Vale, C. L.; Symonds, P. R.; Fresco, L. L.; Williams, C.; Collingwood, M. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2005, (3), CD002225. 5. [5]. DeVita, V. T.; Chu, E. Cancer Res. 2008, 68(21), 8643-8653.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|