Abstract
To effectively conserve animal genetic resources, countries need to periodically review their conservation efforts and reflect on actual problems and challenges. This study provides a review of animal genetic resources conservation activities, as well as the related existing legislative measures, strategies and funding in Slovakia. We present the development of endangered and supported breeds, discuss the impact of subsidies and the importance of awareness raising, and provide a SWOT analysis of the current animal genetic resources conservation framework in the country. In Slovakia, conservation is primarily based on animal breeding in natural conditions (in situ) without any limitations to breed improvement, and cryoconservation of animal genetic resources is in its initial phase. Most of the funding for conservation measures is provided by the Rural Development Programme. In general, the animal genetic resources system in Slovakia is open in terms of including new breeds eligible for support and this paper shows that the provided subsidies helped to stabilize most of the supported populations. Promoting the presence, characteristics and advantages of local breeds in times of intensive import of exotic breeds into the country is crucial to motivate breeders to prefer local livestock breeds. While the future challenge for the government is to improve conservation and facilitate related activities, research should address not only diversity, pedigree studies and cryoconservation, but also focus on the characterization of animal genetic resources for food security and climate change.
Publisher
Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT
Reference60 articles.
1. Blackburn, H D (2009). “Genebank development for the conservation of livestock genetic resources in the United States of America”. Livestock Science 120(3), pp. 196–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.004.
2. Cao, J et al. (2021). “Monitoring and Progress in the Implementation of the Global Plan of Action on Animal Genetic Resources”. Sustainability 13(2), pp. 775–775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020775.
3. CBD (1992). Convention on Biological Diversity. URL: http://www.cbd.int/convention/text.
4. CBD (2011). Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal, Canada. URL: https://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf.
5. Danchin-Burge, C, S J Hiemstra, and H Blackburn (2011). “Ex situ conservation of Holstein-Friesian cattle: Comparing the Dutch, French, and US germplasm collections”. J. Dairy Sci 94(8), pp. 4100–4108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3957.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献