Liquid Modernity and the Holocaust

Author:

Brzeziński DariuszORCID

Abstract

In Modernity and the Holocaust, Zygmunt Bauman argued that the Holocaust had been by no means a negation of the civilising process, but was, on the contrary, its consequence. He claimed that the constitutive features of solid modernity, such as bureaucratic culture, the rise of instrumental rationality and the domination of blueprint utopia, were reflected in the genesis and course of the Holocaust. Bauman’s main aim in writing the book was to make fundamental changes in the problematization of modernity in the social sciences, and to highlight the need to develop norms, values and attitudes that were in opposition to modernity. An overview of these facts provides a starting point for my analysis of Bauman’s later analyses of the Holocaust. By focusing on two issues that he emphasised in the context of the genesis of the Holocaust, namely the mechanism of adiaphorization and the process of the social construction of “otherness”, I show how these phenomena materialize in liquid modernity. I identify their connections with a range of features of the liquid modern condition, including the development of individualism and consumer culture, the sense of insecurity and the “nostalgic turn”. I emphasise that, according to Bauman, both moral indifference and xenophobia are increasingly significant phenomena in contemporary society, which may entail pernicious – and currently barely foreseeable – consequences. I argue that the way Bauman wrote about both solid and liquid modernity was characterised by a dystopian poetics, which was a foundation for his utopian thought.

Publisher

Institute of Slavic Studies Polish Academy of Sciences

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Anthropology,History,Cultural Studies

Reference92 articles.

1. Agamben, G. (2008). Stan wyjątkowy (M. Surma-Gawłowska, Tłum.). Korporacja Ha!art. (Oryginalna praca opublikowana 2003).

2. Alexander, J. C. (2006). Siła utopii i utopia naprawy obywatelskiej. W A. Jasińska-Kania, L. M. Nijakowski, J. Szacki, & M. Ziółkowski (Red.), Współczesne teorie socjologiczne (T. 1, ss. 437–450). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar. (Oryginalna praca opublikowana 2001).

3. Arendt, H. (2008). Korzenie totalitaryzmu (D. Grinberg & M. Szawiel, Tłum.

4. T. 1-2). Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne. (Oryginalna praca opublikowana 1951).

5. Bauer, Y. (2016). Przemyśleć Zagładę (J. Giebułtowicz & J. Syrewicz, Tłum.). Żydowski Instytut Historyczny. (Oryginalna praca opublikowana 2001).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3