What is co-production? Conceptualising and understanding co-production of knowledge and policy across different theoretical perspectives

Author:

Bandola-Gill Justyna1,Arthur Megan1,Leng Rhodri Ivor1

Affiliation:

1. University of Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

Background:‘Co-production’ is one of the key concepts in evidence-informed policy and practice – in terms of both its theoretical importance and its practical applications − being consistently discussed as the most effective strategy for mobilising evidence in policy and practice contexts. The concept of co-production was developed (almost) independently across multiple disciplines and has been employed in various policy and practice fields including environment, sustainability, and health. Aims and objectives:This paper surveys the literature to identify different meanings of co-production across different disciplinary bodies of knowledge. Such exploration is aimed at identifying the key points of convergence and divergence across different disciplinary and theoretical traditions. Methods:We performed a systematic search of Web of Science via a query designed to capture literature likely focusing on co-production, and then manually examined each document for relevance. Citation network analysis was then used to ‘map’ this literature by grouping papers into clusters based on the density of citation links between papers. The top-cited papers within each cluster were thematically analysed. Findings:This research identified five meanings of co-production, understood as a science-politics relationship, as knowledge democracy, as transdisciplinarity, as boundary management, and as an evidence-use intervention. Discussion and conclusions:Even though different clusters of scholarship exploring co-production are closely connected, this concept is mobilised to capture phenomena at different levels of abstraction – from post-structuralist theories of knowledge and power to specific strategies to be employed by researchers and policymakers.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference76 articles.

1. The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates;Albarrán, P.,2011

2. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework;Arksey, H.,2005

3. Co-management and the Co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic;Armitage, D.,2011

4. Adaptive co‐management for Social–ecological complexity;Armitage, D.R.,2009

5. Between relevance and excellence? Research impact agenda and the production of policy knowledge;Bandola-Gill, J.,2019

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Revitalisation of urban spaces by women architects: enhancing cultural heritage in the gulf region;Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research;2023-12-25

2. Co-production revisited: from knowledge plurality to action for disaster risk reduction;Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal;2023-12-05

3. Quantification and Utopia: New Forms of Expert Knowledge Production in Global Education Governance;Palgrave Studies in Science, Knowledge and Policy;2023-12-01

4. Traditional knowledge policy co-production in Colombia and Ecuador;Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society;2023-11-07

5. Coproducing health research with Indigenous peoples;Nature Medicine;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3