Municipal officials’ perspectives on policymaking for addressing obesity and health equity

Author:

Parks Renee G.1,Thomas Fanice1,Morshed Alexandra B.2,Dodson Elizabeth A.1,Tian Ruiyi1,Politi Mary C.1,Eyler Amy A.1,Thomas Ian3,Brownson Ross C.1

Affiliation:

1. Washington University, USA

2. Emory University, USA

3. America Walks, USA

Abstract

Background: Obesity evidence-based policies (EBPs) can make a lasting, positive impact on community health; however, policy development and enactment is complex and dependent on multiple forces. Aims and objectives: This study investigated key factors affecting municipal officials’ policymaking for obesity and related health disparities. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 local officials from a selection of municipalities with high obesity or related health disparities across the United States between December 2020 and April 2021. Findings: Policymakers follow a general decision-making process with limited distinction between health and other policy areas. Factors affecting policymaking included: being informed about other local, state, and federal policy, conducting their own research using trustworthy sources, and seeking constituent and stakeholder perspectives. Key facilitators included the need for timely, relevant local data, and seeing or hearing from those impacted. Key local policymaking barriers included constituent opposition, misinformation, controversial issues with contentious solutions, and limited understanding of the connection between issues and obesity/health. Policymakers had a range of understanding about causes of health disparities, including views of individual choices, environmental influences on behaviours, and structural factors impacting health. To address health disparities, municipal officials described: a variety of roles policymakers can take; limitations based on the scope of government; challenges with intergovernmental collaboration or across government levels; ability of policymakers and government employees to understand the problem; and the challenge of framing health disparities given the social-political context. Discussion and conclusion: Understanding factors affecting the uptake of EBPs can inform local-level interventions that encourage EBP adoption.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference71 articles.

1. Framing of health information messages;Akl, E.A.,2011

2. Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review;Ashcraft, L.E.,2020

3. Public health policy research: making the case for a political science approach;Bernier, N.F.,2011

4. Evidence-Based Policymaking: Insights from Policy-Minded Researchers and Research-Minded Policy Makers;Bogenschneider, K.,2010

5. Understanding evidence-based public health policy;Brownson, R.C.,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3