Framing gender-based violence in multi-level contexts: a networked approach to studying adoption of the Istanbul Convention

Author:

Giesen Michael1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Potsdam, Germany

Abstract

International institutions are an essential driving force of contemporary policies to combat gender-based violence but remain toothless if political actors do not implement them in domestic policies. How can scholars conceptualise the transposition of international gender-based violence norms into domestic policies? I argue that discourse network analysis provides a powerful conceptual and methodological extension of critical frame analysis to understand how frames shape the meaning of gender-based violence norms in multi-level institutional contexts. Frames’ normative and cognitive network structure invites combining discourse network and frame analysis techniques that locate frames’ power in their ability to connect different institutional spheres temporally and spatially. I outline a multi-level research agenda that traces the framing processes of international norms and their domestic implementation through gender-based violence policies in the Council of Europe’s Istanbul Convention. This agenda includes avenues to study how complex transnational policy frameworks like the Istanbul Convention play out in domestic policy implementation.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies

Reference47 articles.

1. Women, Policy and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems;Bacchi, C.L.,1999

2. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be?;Bacchi, C.L.,2009

3. Power in international politics;Barnett, M.,2005

4. Making the most of the frame: developing the analytical potential of frame analysis;Björnehed, E.,2018

5. Abridged report of the 83rd meeting (Strasbourg 4–6 June 2008) b. Draft revised terms of reference of the European Committee on Legal Co-operation (CDCJ) c. Draft terms of reference of the Group of Specialists on the Judiciary (CJ-S-JUD), CM(2008)129, https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805d34a1.,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3