Contestations in coping with elderly care: an intersectional analysis addressing family caregivers in Germany

Author:

Auth Diana1,Leiber Simone2,Leitner Sigrid3

Affiliation:

1. University of Applied Sciences Fulda, Germany

2. University of Applied Sciences Cologne, Germany

3. University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

Abstract

This article addresses inequalities in elderly care from the perspective of family caregivers. By applying an intersectional perspective, we examine the interdependencies of, and interrelations between, the four structural categories of family caregivers’ socio-economic status, gender, ethnicity and employment status, as well as differences in their ability to cope with providing care. We have analysed 20 in-depth semi-structured interviews with family carers in Germany. A high socio-economic status alone did not prove to be sufficient for the good functioning of care arrangements, and ethnicity as a dividing line turned out to be of limited importance. The core result is a typology of five ‘types of coping with care’, three of them with ‘rather successful’ and two with ‘rather precarious’ coping strategies. The types differ in the way difference categories interact. Across all types, it became evident that self-care orientation, self-care action as well as self-determination and control are central for a ‘rather successful’ coping.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies

Reference36 articles.

1. Elder Care. Intersektionelle Analysen der Informellen Betreuung und Pflege Alter Menschen in Österreich,2014

2. Sorgende Angehörige. Eine intersektionale Analyse;Auth, D.,2019

3. Trotz Pflege kein Vereinbarkeitsproblem? Typische Arrangements und Ressourcen erwerbstätiger pflegender Söhne;Auth, D.,2016

4. Intersectionality undone: saving intersectionality from feminist intersectionality studies;Bilge, S.,2013

5. Solidarität in Gefahr? Pflegebereitschaft und Pflegebedarfsentwicklung im Demografischen und Sozialen Wandel, Die ‘Kasseler Studie’;Blinkert, B.,2004

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3