Robust, resilient, agile and improvisatory styles in policymaking: the social organisation of anomaly, risk and policy decay
-
Published:2022-04-01
Issue:2
Volume:50
Page:161-179
-
ISSN:0305-5736
-
Container-title:Policy & Politics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:policy polit
Affiliation:
1. Queen Mary University of London, UK
Abstract
This theory development article employs neo-Durkheimian institutional theory to present a fresh understanding of policy styles in the policy process. Calls for resilient, robust, agile and improvisatory policymaking are not readily compatible with each other. Each of these styles carries
risks and each generates anomalies. Each tends to decay over time. Governments should therefore expect risks of inconsistency and decay in policymaking shaped by these styles. The article argues that these styles, and their risks and tensions, and the trajectories of their decay all arise
from the contrasting forms of informal social organisation among policymakers in which they are cultivated. These forms of social organisation give rise to distinct types of bounded rationality, which shape decision-making differently in each ordering.
Publisher
Bristol University Press
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference88 articles.
1. Unintended, unanticipated or unexpected consequences of policy and surprises for government: understanding how bias and process shape causation – comparing British governments, 1959–74;Public Administration,2014a
2. Explaining decisionmaking in government: the neo-Durkheimian institutional framework;Public Administration,2014b
3. Explaining styles of political judgement in British government: comparing isolation dynamics between administrations (1959–74);Journal of Public Policy,2015
4. How ‘natives’ work;Public Administration,2016