‘Maybe we can turn the tide’: an explanatory mixed-methods study to understand how knowledge brokers mobilise health evidence in low- and middle-income countries

Author:

Norton Theresa C.1ORCID,Rodriguez Daniela C.2ORCID,Howell Catherine3,Reynolds Charlene3,Willems Sara4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Baltimore, USA

2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

3. Jhpiego/Maternal and Child Survival Program, Washington, DC, USA

4. Ghent University, Belgium

Abstract

Background: Little is known about how knowledge brokers (KBs) operate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to translate evidence for health policy and practice. These intermediaries facilitate relationships between evidence producers and users to address public health issues.Aims and objectives: To increase understanding, a mixed-methods study collected data from KBs who had acted on evidence from the 2015 Global Maternal Newborn Health Conference in Mexico.Methods: Of the 1000 in-person participants, 252 plus 72 online participants (n=324) from 56 countries completed an online survey, and 20 participants from 15 countries were interviewed. Thematic analysis and application of knowledge translation (KT) theory explored factors influencing KB actions leading to evidence uptake. Descriptive statistics of respondent characteristics were used for cross-case comparison.Findings: Results suggest factors supporting the KB role in evidence uptake, which include active relationships with evidence users through embedded KB roles, targeted and tailored evidence communication to fit the context, user receptiveness to evidence from a similar country setting, adaptability in the KB role, and action orientation of KBs.Discussion and conclusions: Initiatives to increase evidence uptake in LMICs should work to establish supportive structures for embedded KT, identify processes for ongoing cross-country learning, and strengthen KBs already showing effectiveness in their roles.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The impact of knowledge brokering in health sector and the challenges: A review of literature;Journal of Public Health Research;2023-04

2. Strengthening the science–policy interface in Ireland;Administration;2022-12-01

3. Co-production and arts-informed inquiry as creative power for knowledge mobilisation;Evidence & Policy;2022-05

4. Mixed Methods and Quality of Postgraduate Research;Handbook of Research on Mixed Methods Research in Information Science;2022

5. New evidence and policy research, well-established themes;Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice;2021-02-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3