Human rights in social work: what we cannot not want – a response to Whelan and Flynn

Author:

Brockmann Oliver1

Affiliation:

1. University of Galway, Ireland

Abstract

In 2019, the removal of ‘human rights’ from Ireland’s CORU Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics ignited much opposition and campaigns for reinstatement. This short article responds to Whelan and Flynn’s assertion that alternatives to human rights should be sought, characterising the oppositional response and campaigns as lacking in sophistication. It is argued that human rights have much potential for critical and radical social work and must therefore be defended.

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Reference36 articles.

1. Social Workers Registration Board Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics,2011

2. Social Workers Registration Board Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics,2019a

3. Social Care Workers Registration Board Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics,2019b

4. Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology;Crehan, L.,2002

5. Human rights must be part of everyday practice in mental health social work;Donnelly, S.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3