1. Akinci, S. (2016). A cross-disciplinary study of stance markers in research articles written by students and experts. Unpublished Masters’ Thesis. Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Iowa State University. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15144
Alcaraz-Ariza, M. Á. (2002) Evaluation in English-Medium Medical Book Reviews. International Journal of English Studies, 2(1),137–153.
Babaii, E., Atai, MR., & Saidi, M. (2017) Are scientists objective? An investigation of appraisal resources in English popular science articles. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 1-19.
Bellés-Fortuño, B. (2017). A contrastive study between English and Spanish university lectures. Languages in Contrast. 18(2), 155-174. Doi: 10.1075/lic.15018.bel
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, 57(3), 195e203.
Durrant, P. (2017). Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165-193. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amv011
Fernandes, A. (2011). Appraisal of Evaluative Language in People with Aphasia's Cinderella Narratives. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Groningen.
Ghaemi, F., & Sarlak, H. (2015). A critical appraisal of ESP status in Iran. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 9(1), 262-276.
Gastil, R. G. (1960). The distribution of mineral dates in time and space. American Journal of Science, 258(1), 1-35.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hood, S. (2004). Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. Retreived online from: http://grammatics.com/appraisal/suehoodphd/hoods-phd-links.htm
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
Hyland, K. (2008). Persuasion, interaction, and the construction of knowledge: Representing self and others in research writing. International. Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 1-23.
Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (2), 116-127. Doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003
Hyland, K. (2011). Academic discourse. In K. Hyland & B. Paltridge (Eds.),Continuum companion to discourse analysis (pp. 171-184). London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
Jalilifar, A., Hayati, M. & Mashhadi, A. (2012). Evaluative strategies in Iranian and international research article introductions: Assessment of academic writing, Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 81- 109.
Jalilifar, A., Bardideh, A., & Shooshtari, Z. (2018). From academic to Journalistic texts: A qualitative analysis of the evaluative language of science. Journal of Teaching Language Skilss (JTLS), 37(1), 127-158, DOI: 10.22099/jtls.2018.30299.2554
Johns, C., Chapman, M., & Woods, P. C. (1972). The characteristics of the literature used by historians. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 4(3):137-156, DOI: 10.1177/096100067200400301
Ivanič, R. (1998).Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Khoo, C.G., Nourbakhsh, A., & Na, J. (2012). Sentiment analysis of online news text: A case study of appraisal theory. Online Information Review, 36(6), 1-18.
Millán, E. L. (2014).The Projection of Critical Attitude in Research Article Introductions by Anglo-American and Spanish Author. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses Año 2 (1), 137-153
Li, X. (2016). An attitudinal analysis of English song discourse from the perspective of appraisal theory. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7 (3), 559-565. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0703.17
Liu, X. (2010). An application of appraisal theory to teaching college English reading in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1 (2), 133-135. doi:10.4304/jltr.1.2.133-135
Liu, X. (2013). Evaluation in Chinese university EFL students' English argumentative writing: An Appraisal study. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10 (1), 40-53.
Liu, X. & McCabe, A. (2018). Attitudinal Evaluation in Chinese University Students’ English Writing: A Contrastive Perspective, Springer Singapore. Doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6415-9
Liu, X. & Thompson, P. (2009). Attitude in Students’ Argumentative Writing: A contrastive Perspective. Language Studies Working Papers, 1, 3-15.
Llinares, A. (2015). The interpersonal function of language in CLIL secondary education: Analysis of a spoken and written corpus (INTER-CLIL). European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 343–347.
Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3–39). London, UK: Cassell.
Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007).Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd edition). London: Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mizusawa, Y. (2010). Language use in English academic writing by a tertiary overseas student. Juntendo Health and Sports Science Research, 1 (4), 494-501.
Mori, M. (2017). Using the Appraisal framework to analyze source use in essays: a case study of engagement and dialogism in two undergraduate students’ writing, Functional Linguist, 4(11), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-017-0046-4
Myskow, G. & Ono, M. (2018). A matter of facts: L2 writers’ use of evidence and evaluation in biographical essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.08.002
Munday, JS (2015) Engagement and Graduation resources as markers of translator/interpreter positioning. Target, 27 (3). 406- 412. https://doi.org/ 10.1075/target.27.3.05mun
Ngo, T. & Unsworth, L. (2015). Reworking the appraisal framework in ESL research: refining attitude resources. Functional Linguistics, 2(1), 1-24. DOI 10.1186/s40554-015-0013-x
Oteíza, T. (2017). The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In T. Bartlett, G. & O'Grady (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 457-472). London: Routledge.
Põldvere, N., Matteo, F. & Carita, P. (2016). A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora, 11 (2): 191–225. Doi: 10.3366/cor.2016.0092
Sadeghi, E. & Tahririan, H. (2014). ESP for Psychology and Law Tertiary Level Students: Attitudes, Challenges and Obstacles. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 2(2), 62-77.
Sheldon, E. (2019). Knowledge construction of Discussion/Conclusion sections of research articles written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.002
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, G., & Yiyun, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers.Applied Linguistics, 12 (4), 365-382.https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365
Taboada, M., Carretero, M., and Hinnell, J. (2014). Loving and hating the movies in English, German and Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 14(1): 127–161, Doi: 10.1075/lic.14.1.07tab
White, P. R. (1998). Telling Media Tales: The News Story as Rhetoric. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.
White, P. R. (2001). An introductory tour through appraisal theory. Retrieved on January 2017 from
http://www.languageofevaluation.info/appraisal/appraisaloutline/framed/appraisaloutline.ht
White, P. R. (2002). Appraisal - the language of evaluation and stance. In J. Verschueren, J. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), The handbook of Pragmatics (pp.1-23).Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
Wu, H. (2013). Appraisal perspective on attitudinal analysis of public service advertising discourse.English Language and Literature Studies, 3 (1), 55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ells.v3n1p55
Wu, S. M., & Allison, D. (2003). Exploring appraisal in claims of student writers in argumentative essays. Prospect, 18(3), 71–91.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results toconclusions. English for Specific Purposes. 22(4), 365-385.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
2. Why are abstracts in PhD theses and research articles different? A genre-specific perspective
3. Amornrattanasirichok, A., & Jaroongkhongdach, S. (2017). Engagement in literature reviews of Thai and international research articles in applied linguistics. Online Proceedings of the International Conference: DRAL 3/19th ESEA 2017, 312-327. http://sola.kmutt.ac.th/dral2017/proceedings/5-6Additional/312-327_Engagement%20in%20literature%20reviews_Supattra%20Amornrattanasirichok%20and%20%20Woravut%20Jaroongkhongdach.pdf
4. Akinci, S. (2016). A cross-disciplinary study of stance markers in research articles written by students and experts. Unpublished masters' thesis. Iowa State University. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15144
5. Evaluation in English-Medium Medical Book Reviews