The Impact of Cognitive Styles on the Speech Act of Apology among Iranian EFL Learners

Author:

Maibodi Ashraf,Dehghani Halimeh, ,

Publisher

CMV Verlag

Reference51 articles.

1. References Afghari, A. (2007). A sociopragmatic study of apology speech act realization patterns in Persian. Speech Communication, 49(3), 177-185. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2007.01.003 Ahmadi, A. (2002). On the relationship between field dependence independence and the use of listening comprehension strategies by Iranian EFL students (case study: female English majors in Shiraz). Unpublished Master's Thesis. Shiraz University, Iran. Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M.T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction, and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347-384. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.017 Bayat, N. (2013). A study on the use of speech acts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 213 - 221. Retrieved from: www.sciencedirect.com Bergman, M. L., & Kasper, G. (1993). Perception and performance in native and nonnative apology. In G. Kasper, & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 82-107). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Biook, B., Fathi, M. (2009). The relationship between reading performance and field dependence/independence cognitive style. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(1), 49-62. Birjandi, P. & Rezaei, S. (2010). Developing a multiple-choice discourse completion test of interlanguage pragmatics for Iranian EFL learners. ILI Language Teaching Journal (Special Issue: Proceedings of the First Conference on ELT in the Islamic World), 6 (1, 2), 43-58. Bosacki, S., Innerd, W., & Towson, S. (1997). Field independence-dependence and self-esteem in preadolescents: Does gender make a difference? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26 (60), 691-704. Brown, D. (2007). Principles of language teaching and learning. White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman. Carroll, F. & Sapon, E. (1958). Sex differences in English language acculturation and learning strategies among Vietnamese adults aged 40 and over in the United States. Sex Roles, 19, 747-758. Davies, K.A., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2004). Looking back, taking stock, moving forward: Investigating gender in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 381-404. doi.org/10.2307/3588346 Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fajen, A. (1997). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university students. RELC Journal, 30(2), 101-113. Fatemi, A. H., Vahedi, V. S., & Seyyedrezaie, S. Z. (2014). The effects of top-down/bottom-up processing and field-dependent/field-independent cognitive style on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(4), 686-693. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.4.686-693. Griffin, T. & Franklins, D. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-342. Haji Maibodi. A. (2016). Investigating the effects of individual differences on the speech act of apology in institutional discourse. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 3(2), 71-94. Haji Maibodi, A., Fazilatfar, A.M., & Allami, H. (2016). Exploring subjectivity in verbal reports of Iranian EFL learners in institutional discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(5), 252-263. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.252 Hansen, J. (1995). The relationship of field dependent/independent cognitive styles to foreign language. Language Learning, 31(2), 49-67. Hashemian, M., & Farhang-Ju, M. (2018). Effects of metalinguistic feedback on grammatical accuracy of Iranian field

2. (in) dependent L2 learners' writing ability. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 141-161. Hashemian, M., Jafarpour, A., & Adibpour, M. (2015). Exploring relationships between field

3. (In) dependence, multiple intelligences, and L2 reading performance among Iranian L2 learners. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 40-63. Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men, and politeness. London: Longman. Holmes, J. (2008). An introduction to sociolinguistics. (3rd Ed.), (pp.164-168). England, UK: Pearson, Longman Group. Ishihara, N., & Cohen. A. D. (2010). Learners' pragmatics: potential causes of divergence. In N. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 75-96). Harlow: Longman. Kasper, G. & Rose, K. (1999).Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81-104. Kasper, G. & Rose, K. (2002). The role of instruction in learning second language pragmatics. Language Learning, 52, 237-73. Kasper, G. & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149-169. Kuriscak, L. (2010). The effect of individual-level variables on speech act performance. In A. MartínezeFlor & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical and methodological issues (pp. 23-39). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Khodadady, E., & Zeynali, S. (2012). Field-dependence/independence cognitive style and performance on the IELTS listening comprehension. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 622- 635. doi:10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2389 Khodadady, E., Bagheri, N., & Charbgoo, Z. (2016). Primary school students' cognitive styles and their achievement in English as a Foreign Language. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 851-858. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0705.04 Liu, J. (2004). Measuring interlanguage pragmatic knowledge of EFL learners. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang. Luk, S.C. (2002). The relationship between cognitive styles and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 137-147. Marinova -Todd, S. H., Bradford, M. D., & Snow, C. E. (2000).Three misconceptions about age and learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 9-34. Nilforooshan, N., & Afghari, A. (2007). The effect of field dependence-independence as a source of variation in EFL learners' writing performance. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 1(2), 58-70. Reid, J.M. (2002). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. U.S.A., Brooks Cole Thomson Learning. Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, note taking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 508-517. Rose, K.R. (2000). Field independence-dependence and self-esteem in preadolescents: Does gender make a difference? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(6), 691-703. Rostampour, M., & Niroomand, S. M. (2014). Field dependence/independence cognitive styles: Are they significant at different levels of vocabulary knowledge? International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 2(1), 52-57. Sabaté i Dalmau, M., & Curell i Gotor, H. (2007). From "sorry very much" to "I'm ever so sorry": Acquisitional patterns in L2 apologies by Catalan learners of English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(2), 287-315. Salmanian, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449. Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). Does field independence relate to performance on communicative language tests? Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 3(3), 79-85. Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A (2007). Is field dependence or Independence a predicator of EFL reading performance? TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 82-108. Shalbafan, K. (1996). On the role field dependence/field independence in Iranian EFL learners' writing ability. Unpublished master's thesis. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran. Taguchi, N. (2013). Individual differences and development of speech act production. Applied Research on English Language, 2(2), 1-16. Takahashi, S. (2005). Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation and proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 90-120. Tinajero, C. & Paramo, M.F. (1997). Field dependence-independence cognitive style and academic achievement: A review of research and theory. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 227-251. Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R. & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field- dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research 47(1), 1-64. Yaghoubi, R. (1994). The relationship between field-independent/field-dependent cognitive style Persian students and their English language proficiency. Unpublished master's thesis, Allameh Tabatabaii University, Iran. Yarahmadi, M., (2011). Field independence/dependence and ownership writing differences. Journal of basic and applied scientific research, 1(12), 2734-2735.

4. A sociopragmatic study of apology speech act realization patterns in Persian

5. Ahmadi, A. (2002). On the relationship between field dependence independence and the use of listening comprehension strategies by Iranian EFL students (case study: female English majors in Shiraz). Unpublished Master's Thesis. Shiraz University, Iran.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3