Political security of the state in the conditions of instability of the international political environment

Author:

Vysotskyi Oleksandr

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to define the political security concept in conditions of modern threats to international security. The relevance of political security study is confirmed by the lack of conceptualisation of this concept by social and political sciences. There is a need to define this concept in today's conditions in connection with the changes taking place in the world, particularly in the political arena. Political security concerns the organisational stability of public administration, their systemic governance and the ideology that legitimises. The research results found that the concept of political security is still poorly understood; approaches to its definition are changing following the transformation of general views on political science and need clarification and additions. The findings found that the relationship between political security and humanitarian intervention was closely linked. It has been identified that one of the critical threats to international security today remains state repression, systematic human rights abuses and militarization, which necessitates a focus on political security. It is substantiated that this discussion's nature has changed in both theoretical and practical dimensions due to the changing political environment of security. It is argued that political security, humanitarian intervention, and the right to protection remain a vital part of the international community's discourse and practice. The new policy of protection against humanitarian crises is permeated by differences over the right to intervene and protect. The transformations of threats in the international political arena and the changing nature of the concept of security demonstrate the anachronism of the definition of political security, as new challenges to global security are emerging every day.

Publisher

Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University

Reference24 articles.

1. Acharya, A. (2001). Human security: East versus west. International Journal, 56, 442–460.

2. Amnesty International report 2000. Amnesty International. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol10/0001/2000/en/.

3. Axworthy, L. (2004). A new scientific field and policy lens. Security Dialogue, 35, 348–349.

4. Bellamy, A. (2013). J. The responsibility to protect. In Paul D. Willaims, Security studies, , (pp. 486–502). London.

5. Bellamy, A. J. (2006). Whither the responsibility to protect? Humanitarian intervention and the 2005 world summit. Ethics & International Affairs, 20(2), 143–169.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Concept of National Security in the Period of Cold War and Post-Cold War;Journal of Law and Sustainable Development;2023-09-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3