Abstract
As the number of pacemaker insertions increases to manage numerous cardiac arrhythmias, the number of complications is also increasing as a result. More common complications such as infection and lead displacement are routinely discussed with patients before they undergo the procedure. However rare complications such as superior vena cava syndrome are not discussed during the consenting period. But they do occur, as seen in this case of a 69-year-old male. This fit and active man had a right-sided dual-chamber pacemaker inserted due to sinus node disease and presented 5 years later with symptoms suggestive of superior vena cava obstruction (SVCO). Despite anticoagulation and before surgical intervention could be performed, the patient developed a right-sided chylothorax which was drained. An autologous pericardial patch repair of the SVC and a thrombectomy of SVC clots was subsequently performed. This was only partially successful and the SVCO recurred. A low fatty chain diet was initiated to manage the chylothorax, which remains stable. This rare complication has left the patient with a small pleural effusion and chronic pleural thickening. They can still exercise with mild breathlessness. The management of such a complication, which requires the input of many specialists, is challenging and often does not completely resolve all symptoms. For this reason, superior vena cava obstruction should be considered as a risk during the consenting procedure for a pacemaker insertion.
Publisher
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Reference15 articles.
1. "1. Seligson MT, Surowiec SM. Superior Vena Cava Syndrome [Internet]. PubMed. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 [cited 2024 Mar 8]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441981/
2. 2. Klop B, Scheffer MG, McFadden E, Bracke F, van Gelder B. Treatment of pacemaker-induced superior vena cava syndrome by balloon angioplasty and stenting. Neth Heart J. 2011 Jan;19(1):41-6. doi: 10.1007/s12471-010-0052-6. PMID: 22020858; PMCID: PMC3077837.
3. 3. Cohen R, Mena D, Carbajal-Mendoza R, Matos N, Karki N. Superior vena cava syndrome: A medical emergency? Int J Angiol. 2008 Spring;17(1):43-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1278280. PMID: 22477372; PMCID: PMC2728369.
4. 4. Huang W, Chen Y, Liu Z, Huang Y, Hu Y. Treatment of pacemaker-induced superior vena cava syndrome by direct oral anticoagulant. Thromb J. 2023 Feb 13;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12959-023-00459-6. PMID: 36782246; PMCID: PMC9926563.
5. 5. Teo N, Sabharwal T, Rowland E, Curry P, Adam A. Treatment of superior vena cava obstruction secondary to pacemaker wires with balloon venoplasty and insertion of metallic stents. Eur Heart J. 2002 Sep;23(18):1465-70. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3260. PMID: 12208227.