Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in Quantitative Researches and Practical Considerations

Author:

Sürücü Lütfi1ORCID,Yıkılmaz İbrahim2ORCID,Maşlakçı Ahmet3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. European Leadership University

2. KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

3. BAHÇEŞEHİR KIBRIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

Explanatory factor analysis (EFA) is a multivariate statistical method frequently used in quantitative research and has begun to be used in many fields such as social sciences, health sciences and economics. With EFA, researchers focus on fewer items that explain the structure, instead of considering too many items that may be unimportant and carry out their studies by placing these items into meaningful categories (factors). However, for over sixty years, many researchers have made different recommendations about when and how to use EFA. Differences in these recommendations confuse the use of EFA. The main topics of discussion are sample size, number of items, item extraction methods, factor retention criteria, rotation methods and general applicability of the applied procedures. The abundance of these discussions and opinions in the literature makes it difficult for researchers to decide which procedures to follow in EFA. For this reason, it would be beneficial for researchers to gather different information about the general procedures (sample number, rotation methods, etc.) in the use of EFA. This paper aims to provide readers with an overview of what procedures to follow when implementing EFA and share practical information about the latest developments in methodological decisions in the EFA process. It is considered that the study will be an important guide for the researchers in the development of clear decision paths in the use of EFA, with the aspect of presenting the most up-to-date information collectively.

Funder

Yoktur

Publisher

Gumushane University

Reference51 articles.

1. 1. Child, D. (2006). “The essentials of factor analysis. (3rd ed.)”. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

2. 2. Bartholomew, D, Knotts, M. and Moustaki, I. (2011). “Latent variable models and factor analysis: A unified approach. (3rd ed.)”. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

3. 3. Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007). “Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.)”. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

4. 4. Beavers, A. S, Lounsbury, J. W, Richards, J. K, Huck, S. W, Skolits, G. J. and Esquivel, S. L. (2013). “Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research”. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 18 (1), 6–16.

5. 5. Fabrigar, L. R, Wegener, D. T, MacCallum, R. C. and Strahan, E. J. (1999). “Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research”. Psychological Methods, 4 (3), 272–299.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3