Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University
2. Nizhne-Volzhsky Research Institute of Geology and Geophysics
Abstract
Oligocene-Lower Miocene clinoforms of the Maikop formation are productive in the Eastern and Central Pre-Caucasus region. In spite of commercial discoveries and long exploration history, Maikop formation is poor characterized by borehole data in the deep basins such as Terek-Caspian trough. Furthermore, there are challenges of the detail stratigraphic subdivision in the deep basins, correlation, sedimentary conditions and criteria of reservoirs exploration.
Based on seismic and borehole data analysis, sequent-stratigraphic framework, distribution area, progradation direction, seismic unconformities and thicknesses of the 17 Maikop sequences are established. Estimation of the clinoforms height allowed reconstructing paleobathymetry and paleogeography of the Pre-Caucasus region in the Oligocene – Early Miocene.
Clinoforms M1-M7 prograded from the northeast, sea depth increased from 300 to 450 m. During clinoforms M8 sedimentation, new provenance area appeared on the west, sea depth increases up to 800 m. Clinoforms M12-M16 prograded from the north, sea depth decreases from 480 to 270 m. To the end of the M17 sequence deposition, starved deep basin was totally compensated.
Three morphologic types of the clinoforms are identified. Type I represents by tangential clinoforms up to 75 m of height, that interpreted as subaqueous delta. Type II are the sigmoid shelf-edge delta clinoforms up to 800 m of height. Clinoforms of type III are low-angle wedges, confined to the slope and floor of the deep basin. Height of the wedges does not exceed 270 m. In the topset of the shelf-edge deltas, shallow-marine sandstones and structural traps predicted, while basin floor fans and stratigraphic traps expected in the bottomset. Subaqueous deltas are regarded to stratigraphic traps, while the wedges are predominantly mud-prone.
Reference35 articles.
1. Babina E.O., Kalmykov G.A., Stoupakova A.V., Mordasova A.V., Korobova N.I., Khotylev O.V., Shardanova T.A., Khromova E.V., Gilaev R.M. (2022). Geometry analysis and oil reservoirs prediction in the Lower Cretaceous clinoforms of the northern Priobskoe field. Moscow University Bull. Geol., 4. (In Russ.) (In press)
2. Borodkin V.N., Kurchikov A.R. (2015). To the problem of refining the western and eastern boundaries of the Achimov clinoform complex (West Siberia). Russ. Geol. Geophys., 56(9), pp. 1281–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2015.08.005
3. Ershov A.V., Brunet M.E., Nikishin A.M., Bolotov S.N., Korotaev M.V., Kosova S.S. (1998). Evolution of the eastern Fore-Caucasus basin during the Cenozoic collision: burial history and flexural modelling. In: Peri-Tethys Memoir 4. Eds. S. Crasquin-Soleau, E. Barrier. Paris: Memoires du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, v. 179, рp. 111–130.
4. Ershov S.V. (2016). Paleobathymetry of the Late Jurassic–Neocomian basin in northern West Siberia and the impact of natural processes. Russ. Geol. Geophys., 57(8), pp. 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgg.2016.08.008
5. Evdokimova M. L. (2004). Formation conditions and oil and gas content of the Maikop formation of the Central and Eastern Ciscaucasia. Cand. geol. and min. sci. diss. Moscow. (In Russ.)