It’s Time to Give Up on Breeder Reactors

Author:

Cochran Thomas B.1,Feiveson Harold A.2,Mian Zia3,Ramana M. V.4,Schneider Mycle5,von Hippel Frank N.6

Affiliation:

1. Thomas B. Cochran is a senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Nuclear Program.

2. Harold A. Feiveson is a senior research scientist at Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security.

3. Zia Mian directs the Project for Peace and Security in South Asia at Princeton University’s Program on Science and Global Security.

4. M. V. Ramana is a visiting research scholar at Princeton University’s Program in Science, Technology, and Environmental Policy and the Program on Science and Global Security.

5. Mycle Schneider is an independent energy consultant and produces the “World Nuclear Industry Status Report.”

6. Frank N. von Hippel is professor of public and international affairs at Princeton University and co-chair of the International Panel on Fissile Materials.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference7 articles.

1. Thomas B. Cochran, Harold A. Feiveson, Walt Patterson, Gennadi Pshakin, M.V. Ramana, Mycle Schneider, Tatsujiro Suzuki, and Frank von Hippel, "Fast Breeder Reactor Programs: History and Status," International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM) Research Report no. 8, February 2010. Available at http://www.ipfmlibrary.org/rr08.pdf .

2. These projections were discussed in Mycle Schneider, Steve Thomas, Antony Froggatt, and Doug Koplow, "2009 World Nuclear Industry Status Report," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , November/December 2009, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1-19.

3. For a full technical analysis of how much the cost of uranium factors into the cost of electricity generated at a nuclear power plant, see Massachusetts Institute of Technology, The Future of Nuclear Power, An MIT Interdisciplinary Study (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003), app. 5A.

4. This would be a capital cost difference on the order of $1,000 per kilowatt of generating capacity compared to a conventional reactor. With a 10 percent capital charge and a 90 percent average capacity factor (where the reactor operated 90 percent of the time), it would translate to a cost difference of about 1.3 cents per kilowatt hour.

5. Matthew Bunn, Steve Fetter, John Holdren, and Bob van der Zwaan, "The Economics of Reprocessing Versus Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel," Nuclear Technology , vol. 150 (June 2005), p. 209.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3