Probability Weighting in Decision-Making Tasks under Risk

Author:

Uzhga-Rebrov Oleg1,Kuleshova Galina2

Affiliation:

1. Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Rezekne, Latvia

2. Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia

Abstract

The analysis of alternative decisions and the choice of the optimal – in a given sense – decision is an integral part of people’s purposeful activity in all areas of their social life. Many formal approaches have been proposed to solve these problems. One such approach is expected utility theory, which correctly models individuals’ subjective preferences and attitudes to risk. For a very long time this theory was the leading approach for decision making under conditions of risk. However, numerous practical studies have shown its weakness: the theory did not explicitly use subjective perceptions of decision outcome probabilities in optimal decision-making processes. This research has led to the creation and development of approaches to explicitly consider the probabilities of outcomes in decision making. This paper provides a critical analysis of the descriptive properties of expected utility theory and presents various forms of probability weighting functions.

Publisher

Riga Technical University

Subject

General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. J. von Neuman and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1944.

2. L. J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley, 1954.

3. P. J. H. Schoemaker, “The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 529–563, 1982.

4. W. Edwards, “The theory of decision making”, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 380–417, 1954. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053870

5. W. Edwards, “Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions,” Psychological Review, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 109–135, 1962. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0038674

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3