Determining Soil Moisture Content and Material Properties with Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
-
Published:2020-12-23
Issue:5
Volume:15
Page:136-159
-
ISSN:1822-427X
-
Container-title:The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:BJRBE
Author:
Latvala JuhaORCID, Luomala HeikkiORCID, Kolisoja PauliORCID
Abstract
This study utilised static triaxial and dynamic cone penetration tests to examine the identification of changes in strength in soil materials as a result of an increase in moisture content. The applicability of a light dynamic cone penetrometer device in railway environments was also studied. On a broader scale, the aim was to find an investigation method suited to field locations that identify low-quality or persistently moist materials directly from the structure. The triaxial tests found an apparent increase in shear strength when the water content dropped below 7%. Based on the series of laboratory tests, the dynamic cone penetrometer reacted strongly to material density, but the impact of moisture content was also evident. Furthermore, the results showed that dynamic cone resistance is a reasonably unfeasible metric for assessing the structural quality of materials consisting primarily of sand, due to the number of factors affecting the resistance. In the laboratory tests, the lowest dynamic cone resistances were measured in the material with the highest structural quality.
Publisher
Riga Technical University
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference27 articles.
1. Abuel-Naga, H. M., Holtrigter, M., & Pender, M. J. (2011). Simple method for correcting dynamic cone penetration test results for rod friction. Géotechnique Letters, 1(3), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.11.00012 2. Benz-Navarrete, M. A., Breul, P., & Moustan, P. (2019, November). Servo-Assisted and Computer-Controlled Variable Energy Dynamic Super Heavy Penetrometer. In Geotechnical Engineering in the XXI Century: Lessons learned and future challenges: Proceedings of the XVI Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering (XVI PCSMGE), 17-20 November 2019, Cancun, Mexico (p. 65). IOS Press. 3. Benz-Navarrete, M. A., Escobar, E., Haddani, Y., Gourves, R., D’Aguiar, S. C., & Calon, N. (2014). Determination of Soil Dynamic Parameters by the Panda 3®: Railways Platform Case. In Proc. of the Second International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development & Maintenance”, Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper (Vol. 56). https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.104.56 4. Bolton, M. D., Gui, M. W., Garnier, J., Corte, J. F., Bagge, G., Laue, J., & Renzi, R. (1999). Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand. Géotechnique, 49(4), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1999.49.4.543 5. Brough, M. J., Ghataora, G. S., Stirling, A. B., Madelin, K. B., Rogers, C. D. F., & Chapman, D. N. (2003, August). Investigation of railway track subgrade. I: In-situ assessment. In Proc. of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport (Vol. 156, No. 3, pp. 145-154). Thomas Telford Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.2003.156.3.145
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|